Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

RE: how was elbow to nuts a F2 and elbow

Posted on: January 15, 2025 at 14:13:23 CT
implode STL
Posts:
61887
Member For:
25.13 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
I am perplexed how they read intent into the act. I’m also surprised they didn’t also take into account the contact / proximity of the defender in why this occurred. But perhaps, I don’t understand the changing rules. As a fan the only thing harder to figure out then the new names each year is emphasis on how rules are to be interpreted.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

how was elbow to nuts a F2 and elbow - fatrat MU - 1/15 13:32:00
     It was clearly 8-on-5. - ERB KC - 1/15 16:30:48
     RE: how was elbow to nuts a F2 and elbow - implode STL - 1/15 14:13:23
          Is there no longer a "cylinder" rule?(nm) - Harvey Specter MU - 1/15 14:30:06
               I don’t know - implode STL - 1/15 14:56:19
     Cause the ruies(nm) - meatiger MU - 1/15 13:48:23
          You are the one that doesn't known the rules, meat (nm) - TheWildcat MU - 1/15 13:58:59
          The rule says it's illegal if it's non-incidental - Columbian Gold MU - 1/15 13:52:20
     any forceable contact to the head used to be F1 - Harvey Specter MU - 1/15 13:46:13
     Those refs are exceptional mind readers - hou4mu MU - 1/15 13:43:25
          It is funny because Perkins wasn't even looking at the ... - BandG MU - 1/15 13:47:41
               yep. He looked like holy ****y man, I didn't mean to hit - SabertoothTiger MU - 1/15 14:23:41
          Grill's grab was just a reaction to the guy throwing - Harvey Specter MU - 1/15 13:46:47
     Ref took like 5 seconds to review that one - Columbian Gold MU - 1/15 13:37:23
     RE: how was elbow to nuts a F2 and elbow - Dylan MU - 1/15 13:35:36




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard