Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

This ∆∆. Missouri could have maybe even fouled

Posted on: January 15, 2025 at 00:23:21 CT
Lt. J. Dangle MU
Posts:
16916
Member For:
21.32 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
when it got under 3 seconds or so
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

For those worried about that last 3 pointer making it - Lt. J. Dangle MU - 1/15 00:05:35
     With zero defense, it was a mile long prayer. If grill’s - alwaysright MU - 1/15 07:06:18
     but is that reviewable?... a 3-pointer is definitely - zounami MU - 1/15 00:09:30
          I don't know, I feel like the officials let it go because - Lt. J. Dangle MU - 1/15 00:15:18
               I think if they do not grant the TO - meatiger MU - 1/15 00:31:58
                    They called a technical on Chris Webber right? He was - Lt. J. Dangle MU - 1/15 00:36:44
                         I think they did blow the whistle on it - meatiger MU - 1/15 00:55:27
                         by "grant" he meant notice & acknowledge the TO request... - zounami MU - 1/15 00:51:36
                              Maybe. Either way the guy definitely called a timeout when - Lt. J. Dangle MU - 1/15 01:03:50
               regardless of the reason, they didn't call it... - zounami MU - 1/15 00:17:08
                    No. If it's a 3 point game, Missouri doesn't play their - Lt. J. Dangle MU - 1/15 00:21:34
                         Agreed, and I made that point below. But what matters are... - zounami MU - 1/15 00:25:53
                    but... it would be outrageous if the SEC even considered - zounami MU - 1/15 00:18:17
                         This ∆∆. Missouri could have maybe even fouled - Lt. J. Dangle MU - 1/15 00:23:21
                              That's what I said we would have done (nm) - Uncle John KC - 1/15 00:26:04
                    They cannot (nm) - SatoriTiger JC - 1/15 00:17:36
                         cannot what?... please be more specific (nm) - zounami MU - 1/15 00:18:33
                              Appeal after the time runs out. (nm) - Uncle John KC - 1/15 00:20:05
                              They cannot appeal - SatoriTiger JC - 1/15 00:19:43
                                   and you're absolutely sure about that? (nm) - zounami MU - 1/15 00:21:45
                                        I think the only thing you can look at after the buzzer - meatiger MU - 1/15 00:33:54
                                             It's not the buzzer, but the referee approving the final - SatoriTiger JC - 1/15 00:35:58
                                                  "and I believe the rule only allows you to review a 3 at ... - zounami MU - 1/15 00:47:30
                                        Yes - SatoriTiger JC - 1/15 00:26:36
                                             good, thanks for confirming that (nm) - zounami MU - 1/15 00:27:16
                                        Yeah, they can't go back and change the score after - Lt. J. Dangle MU - 1/15 00:24:50
                                             you'd think, but who knows what kind of obscure appeals - zounami MU - 1/15 00:28:06
                                                  Are you suggesting that it may be possible for the - Lt. J. Dangle MU - 1/15 00:33:35
                                                       an appeals process that would allow a team to challenge - zounami MU - 1/15 00:45:37
                                                            Any point during the game is the problem. Unless it was the - Lt. J. Dangle MU - 1/15 00:58:18
                                                                 Actually, I think it has to be reviewed by the next timeout. - zounami MU - 1/15 01:05:37
                                        I'm not, but I've never seen it happen (nm) - Uncle John KC - 1/15 00:24:09
                                             same here, but I wanted someone to confirm it... - zounami MU - 1/15 00:29:06




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard