Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Why 9? What's significant about that number?

Posted on: December 13, 2024 at 10:08:54 CT
GeorgiaTiger76 MU
Posts:
6803
Member For:
14.41 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
I'd say these guys are in the rotation pretty soundly. Anyone else just needs time in blowouts or foul trouble:

Tier 1: Perkins, Ant, Mitchell, Bates, Grill, Gray, Shaw
Tier 2: Marshall, Allen, Pierce, Warrick

I know, that's 11 guys. More than 9, but we've got a deep roster this year.

Burns, Barrett, and even Boateng just don't seem ready to play meaningful minutes in big games. Maybe that will change in these last few non-con games, but it seems like the staff is starting to figure out rotations.

Not sure we have a role for Crews, honestly. I wouldn't waste much PT on him -- give that to the young guys when there is a blowout. That's one benefit of all of these cupcakes - lots of minutes available for the young guys to get on the court and rest the legs of our key dudes.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

With Grill healthy can someone name our top 9?(nm) - oldtgr MU - 12/12 16:35:59
     RE: With Grill healthy can someone name our top 9?(nm) - SPD MU - 12/13 13:27:05
     Why 9? What's significant about that number? - GeorgiaTiger76 MU - 12/13 10:08:54
     I don’t think Gates could answer this question (nm) - FIJItiger MU - 12/12 18:00:41
          Precisely, probably a fluid situation - implode STL - 12/12 18:35:54
          Reason I asked is because I saw the players minutes vs KU(nm) - oldtgr MU - 12/12 18:21:29
               I suspect it will differ greatly from game to game(nm) - FIJItiger MU - 12/12 19:25:42
                    To some degree yes. - wu-tangtiger MU - 12/12 19:29:27
     The top 9 are - MidMoBaller4Life MU - 12/12 16:56:01
          Thanks.I think it's important to have 9 then go from there(nm) - oldtgr MU - 12/12 17:49:08
     There is no top 9, there are rotations - Macgrantt MU - 12/12 16:41:53
          I am intrigued by Barret - semotiger83 MU - 12/13 13:55:45
               I think he’s ready defensively - wu-tangtiger MU - 12/13 16:24:27
          I'd guess we stop seeing much of Barrett/Pierce (nm) - Columbian Gold MU - 12/12 16:48:09
               Pierce came in early, he'll play and should - Macgrantt MU - 12/12 18:50:59
                    RE: Pierce came in early, he'll play and should - Brewer MU - 12/12 18:53:03
                         Correct. Work him through it. He should become a - alwaysright MU - 12/12 21:54:27
               They both played vs kansas. I think that rotation with a - MIZtigerZOU MU - 12/12 17:11:18
          Thanks.Thats 12...do you think we'll keep playing 12?(nm) - oldtgr MU - 12/12 16:48:06
          Most of Shaw’s minutes have come at the 5 - wu-tangtiger MU - 12/12 16:44:26
               RE: Most of Shaw’s minutes have come at the 5 - Brewer MU - 12/12 19:05:14
                    It recently worked in a win against #1 (nm) - Columbian Gold MU - 12/12 19:21:02
               RE: Most of Shaw’s minutes have come at the 5 - Brewer MU - 12/12 18:59:17
                    What are you talking about (nm) - wu-tangtiger MU - 12/12 19:27:13
     Could someone break it down in minutes?(nm) - oldtgr MU - 12/12 16:36:30
          RE: Could someone break it down in minutes?(nm) - MOKE MU - 12/12 17:48:38
               Thanks.(nm) - oldtgr MU - 12/12 17:50:13
                    RE: Thanks.(nm) - MOKE MU - 12/12 18:08:01
                         It's ok I still appreciate your participation and answer(nm) - oldtgr MU - 12/12 18:19:46




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard