rask: I never commented much on the Steele dossier

Posted on: November 10, 2024 at 09:12:29 CT

http://www.tigerboard.com/boards/view.php?message=19258608

Also rask:

Steele is best of class Brit on Russian Intel.

http://www.tigerboard.com/boards/view.php?message=15353027


You see you want this MEMO b/c it is incomplete and as such paints a false picture and it too, over time, falls on its face. The THRUST is that if the Right can poke one hole in the story then EVERYTHING that Mueller has found goes away - it doesn't. The investigation was not solely or primarily dependent on this stack of files, called ominously "the dossier". Fusion also did not HIRE Steele. Steele brought the doc to the FBI independently.

http://www.tigerboard.com/boards/view.php?message=15379505

http://www.tigerboard.com/boards/view.php?message=15379597

Steele was horrified that someone who could be so comprised by Russia could reach the oval office.

http://www.tigerboard.com/boards/view.php?message=15415221

Steele has sources:

http://www.tigerboard.com/boards/view.php?message=15415239

Steele saw how deep Russia and Trump's ties are:

http://www.tigerboard.com/boards/view.php?message=15425894

Steele was dead on:

The idea being proposed is that Steele's stuff wasn't reliable. The #1 expert on Russian intel in the UK, hired first by a GOP big whig, then paid by Free Beacon - you guys didn't have a problem with him then - but then when Beacon fell off, of course HRC picked it up. Wouldn't you? It doesn't mean it is wrong. It suggests it was dead on.

http://www.tigerboard.com/boards/view.php?message=15425929

Steele's intel was supported by the FBI:


What I said was that intel from Steele that supported what FBI already had on Page means it is not dubious but more dead on.


http://www.tigerboard.com/boards/view.php?message=15425964


This is just me taking 5 minutes to look at some of rask's posts from 2018, there are many more out there.

Edited by Calca at 09:13:37 on 11/10/24