 |
|
you're mistaken - it wasn't 50 meteorologists, it was 50
Posted on: October 16, 2024 at 17:39:55 CT
90Tiger STL
Posts:
166960
Member For:
23.55 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
climate scientists, of which there are NOT 13000.
Those who have signed the letter represent the overwhelming majority of climate change scientists in the United States, of whom there are about 60.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1112950/
you should READ more and TYPE less
McMichael and Haines quote the 1995 report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which is widely believed to “prove” that climate change induced by humans has occurred.3 The original draft document did not say this. What happened was that the policymakers’ summary (which became the “take home message” for politicians) altered the conclusions of the scientists. This led Dr Frederick Seitz, former head of the United States National Academy of Sciences, to write, “In more than sixty years as a member of the American scientific community ... I have never witnessed a more disturbing corruption of the peer-review process than the events that led to this IPCC report.”4
Edited by 90Tiger at 17:42:38 on 10/16/24
Those who have signed the letter represent the overwhelming majority of climate change scientists in the United States, of whom there are about 60.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1112950/
you should READ more and TYPE less
McMichael and Haines quote the 1995 report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which is widely believed to “prove” that climate change induced by humans has occurred.3 The original draft document did not say this. What happened was that the policymakers’ summary (which became the “take home message” for politicians) altered the conclusions of the scientists. This led Dr Frederick Seitz, former head of the United States National Academy of Sciences, to write, “In more than sixty years as a member of the American scientific community ... I have never witnessed a more disturbing corruption of the peer-review process than the events that led to this IPCC report.”4
Edited by 90Tiger at 17:42:38 on 10/16/24
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
you're mistaken - it wasn't 50 meteorologists, it was 50 - 90Tiger STL - 10/16 17:39:55