 |
|
That is climate, not 'climate change'. Someone posted a link
Posted on: October 3, 2024 at 12:43:05 CT
JeffB MU
Posts:
69638
Member For:
20.86 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
not long ago showing that the number of hurricanes and their severity hasn't really been going up over the years. More and more people are moving near the coasts where they tend to hit, however, and there are a lot more homes and businesses & other infrastructure in harm's way now compared to years ago.
"Man-made" climate change is a hypothesis in dispute.
There are also very high costs associated with trying to reduce carbon emissions... and there is some dispute about the hypothesis that carbon in the atmosphere is having a substantial effect upon climate.
There is also substantial evidence that the government heavily skews the studies by funding only the scientists who will agree with their agenda that we are experiencing anthropogenic climate change, and punishing those that don't agree with them:
The Distortion of Climate Data Using ‘Computer Models’ | Facts Matter
https://youtu.be/2lseti5zvY0
A number of economists have also examined the costs vs benefits using the data of the scientist proposing anthropogenic global warming & have concluded that countries would get far more bang for their bucks and save far more lives by spending that climate change money elsewhere.
Bjorn Lomborg discussed the economists' conclusions in one of his videos. Not sure if these go over that info, but they're along the same lines.
Some of his articles:
https://lomborg.com/news
Bjørn Lomborg: How rising temperatures will save lives
https://youtu.be/nwOYjC2IzZc
Why Carbon Neutrality Doesn't Make Sense | Dr. Bjorn Lomborg
https://youtu.be/d51qDgeF8vY
"Man-made" climate change is a hypothesis in dispute.
There are also very high costs associated with trying to reduce carbon emissions... and there is some dispute about the hypothesis that carbon in the atmosphere is having a substantial effect upon climate.
There is also substantial evidence that the government heavily skews the studies by funding only the scientists who will agree with their agenda that we are experiencing anthropogenic climate change, and punishing those that don't agree with them:
The Distortion of Climate Data Using ‘Computer Models’ | Facts Matter
https://youtu.be/2lseti5zvY0
A number of economists have also examined the costs vs benefits using the data of the scientist proposing anthropogenic global warming & have concluded that countries would get far more bang for their bucks and save far more lives by spending that climate change money elsewhere.
Bjorn Lomborg discussed the economists' conclusions in one of his videos. Not sure if these go over that info, but they're along the same lines.
Some of his articles:
https://lomborg.com/news
Bjørn Lomborg: How rising temperatures will save lives
https://youtu.be/nwOYjC2IzZc
Why Carbon Neutrality Doesn't Make Sense | Dr. Bjorn Lomborg
https://youtu.be/d51qDgeF8vY
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
That is climate, not 'climate change'. Someone posted a link - JeffB MU - 10/3 12:43:05