 |
|
First of all
Posted on: July 26, 2024 at 16:47:27 CT
JG MU
Posts:
250566
Member For:
20.82 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
I have never said it was from the teleprompter, so take that to the MIZ45 school of strawman posting.
I have never said he definitely WAS NOT hit by a bullet.
I have said the following things:
A) 4 PA officers/troopers (maybe local police, not totally sure which) were injured by shrapnel
B) it was said they were close to the trump, but this part of the story is so buried I can not find the original report nor any follow up
C) rather oddly we have seen NO medical reports, pictures or statements -other than from the lying
Jackson who can be discounted entirely from telling anything like the truth. Oh and BTW his followup report
seems suspicious as shiite out of nowhere.
D) we have seen NO followup evidence of what the ear looked like. For about 12 days he wore a bandage covering any wound.
It does appear that he is no longer wearing a bandage but I have seen nor found anything that looks like a closeup. The lying Jackson reported there were no sutures. The pics I have seen from afar look like there is nothing wrong with his ear whatsoever. Hardly what you would expect from even a mild graze from a high caliber bullet.
I am saying we have been given no evidence of what (if anything frankly) hit the trumps ear.
Now keep in mind that if you are going to consider that the assassination attempt was a conspiracy that the evidence strongly leans towards false flag.
I woudn't mind it being proven that a bullet did hit his ear. I do mind that at least some think we should 100% believe that sans any evidence.
Edited by JG at 17:08:13 on 07/26/24
I have never said he definitely WAS NOT hit by a bullet.
I have said the following things:
A) 4 PA officers/troopers (maybe local police, not totally sure which) were injured by shrapnel
B) it was said they were close to the trump, but this part of the story is so buried I can not find the original report nor any follow up
C) rather oddly we have seen NO medical reports, pictures or statements -other than from the lying
Jackson who can be discounted entirely from telling anything like the truth. Oh and BTW his followup report
seems suspicious as shiite out of nowhere.
D) we have seen NO followup evidence of what the ear looked like. For about 12 days he wore a bandage covering any wound.
It does appear that he is no longer wearing a bandage but I have seen nor found anything that looks like a closeup. The lying Jackson reported there were no sutures. The pics I have seen from afar look like there is nothing wrong with his ear whatsoever. Hardly what you would expect from even a mild graze from a high caliber bullet.
I am saying we have been given no evidence of what (if anything frankly) hit the trumps ear.
Now keep in mind that if you are going to consider that the assassination attempt was a conspiracy that the evidence strongly leans towards false flag.
I woudn't mind it being proven that a bullet did hit his ear. I do mind that at least some think we should 100% believe that sans any evidence.
Edited by JG at 17:08:13 on 07/26/24
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
First of all - JG MU - 7/26 16:47:27