Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

and CO2 emissions are pollution? (nm)

Posted on: July 5, 2024 at 15:07:48 CT
JeffB MU
Posts:
66130
Member For:
20.61 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
2
(nm) means no message
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

The Clean Air Act is quite clear in its wording - JG A - 7/5 14:44:45
     lol(nm) - TigerFan92 STL - 7/6 08:24:12
     You are kidding of course, that is about as vague as you - MU-TULSA MU - 7/5 15:23:30
          the intent is crystal clear - JG A - 7/5 18:18:43
          Agencies took advantage of vague language and took their reg - BH O'bonga MU - 7/5 16:34:25
          Just more conservative cheering of the government giving - MIZ45 MU - 7/5 16:32:46
     clean water act was pretty clear too - CulturedDan KC - 7/5 15:21:40
          lol(nm) - Th8tnTiger MU - 7/5 15:31:31
     Do you believe that the costs of any remedies should be in - JeffB MU - 7/5 14:48:03
          Thats an entirely depends answer and looks at it from the - JG A - 7/5 15:04:01
               and CO2 emissions are pollution? (nm) - JeffB MU - 7/5 15:07:48
                    yes of course it can be - JG A - 7/5 18:19:32
                         So you are saying that it's a continuum? It could be a lot - JeffB MU - 7/5 18:30:54
                              I don't , nor does anyone else have - JG A - 7/5 18:35:44
     MO GUBMINT PEASE! (nm) - MIZ45 MU - 7/5 14:47:31




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard