Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

In the extreme, it's potentially a very dangerous opinion

Posted on: July 1, 2024 at 21:45:32 CT
Mormad MU
Posts:
54735
Member For:
17.96 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Imagine that the President wakes up tomorrow and decides that he is pro-Hamas. Wild, weird scenario - won't happen, but imagine the extreme because someone could push it there. Qualified immunity has existed for a long time, and while there have been instances where it has been problematic, absolute immunity is a horrid idea. I believe they said that communications with staff can't be considered. You guys celebrate Snowden and Assange. They could now be killed and the instructions to do so would be undiscoverable, or at the very least, couldn't be used to determine whether there was intent to commit an official act or to exact a petty grievance. It's a horrible decision and that's not even about Trump. Just look at the clowns in office from both extremes. You want them to have that kind of power?
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Why can’t the board libs explain what the SC got wrong ?(nm) - ZouMiz STL - 7/1 20:10:53
     In the extreme, it's potentially a very dangerous opinion - Mormad MU - 7/1 21:45:32
     Fiji is one step away from pulling out the big rhetorical - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/1 20:29:56
     RE: Why can’t the board libs explain what the SC got wrong ?(nm) - FIJItiger MU - 7/1 20:22:31
          Uh, the state had n o right to remove him from the ballot - OntheMark MU - 7/1 20:52:45
          9-0 on colo. - fatrat MU - 7/1 20:38:53
          You didn't explain what they got wrong - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/1 20:27:42
               That's all he has. He's an emotional imbecile(nm) - TigerFan92 STL - 7/2 08:32:07
          Wasn’t the Colorado vote 9-0?(nm) - ZouMiz STL - 7/1 20:25:19
               Yes, which proves once again that people like - Outsider MU - 7/1 20:27:19
                    He's just saying what he was told - Wildcat KSU - 7/1 21:25:11
               Yes, totally absurd and non legit (nm) - FIJItiger MU - 7/1 20:26:29
                    So the lib justices are in on it too?(nm) - ZouMiz STL - 7/1 20:42:59
                    so the clearly "liberal" justices are in on it and support - 90Tiger STL - 7/1 20:29:38
                         RE: so the clearly "liberal" justices are in on it and support - sarasotatiger MU - 7/1 20:49:58
                              I thought you were supposedly more wise about these things(nm) - Wildcat KSU - 7/1 21:26:05
                              oh, ok, lol is this a serious response? (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 7/1 21:18:22
                              So explain the Dredd Scot case then(nm) - Calca STL - 7/1 20:53:20
                    Yet you still cannot explain why - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/1 20:28:22
                    if it is “partisan” like you claim below - Fire Marshall Bill MU - 7/1 20:28:02
                         It is no longer a legit institution or worthy of respect (nm) - FIJItiger MU - 7/1 20:28:42
                              Only when decisions don't go your way.... - Logan BAMA - 7/1 20:44:01
                              you're a pull-string toy (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 7/1 20:36:24
                              that wasn’t the question(nm) - Fire Marshall Bill MU - 7/1 20:30:44
     Because that would require them understanding the decision (nm) - Spanky KU - 7/1 20:18:43
          ^^^ trooph ^^^(nm) - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/1 20:20:36
          LOL(nm) - Fire Marshall Bill MU - 7/1 20:19:35




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard