I believe that "ok" acknowledged that, dumbphuck.
Posted on: June 17, 2024 at 10:44:33 CT
tigerdb MU
Posts:
57462
Member For:
23.33 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
the Ds would not have held Garland in contempt (they wouldn't be looking for a video for "optic" purposes - as sal called it); the Rs wouldn't have held Barr or Bannon in contempt (they wouldn't have been digging into Barr's actions or J6.)
Anything else?