Welcome Guest

What findings are those?

Posted on: May 21, 2024 at 13:00:36 CT
Sal CMSU
Posts:
229171
Member For:
22.02 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
The judge let 'witnesses' for the prosecution ramble on about irrelevant information, but then attacks a defense witness and would never let him answer a question. He also wouldn't let an FEC attorney testify about election laws, even though Bragg's team hinted in the beginning of the trial that Trump may have violated one of those said laws.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     His findings have favored the defense over prosecution - raskolnikov MU - 5/21 12:51:34
          where he wont allow a campaign finance expert? - Coors4bob STL - 5/21 17:19:26
          Please provide examples - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 5/21 13:30:07
          What findings are those? - Sal CMSU - 5/21 13:00:36
     Well that's conclusive... - Gyro STL - 5/21 11:08:44
          RE: Well that's conclusive... - Fire Marshall Bill MU - 5/21 11:12:40
          Nice that you're back. And as always, only posting about - hokie VT - 5/21 11:10:41
               You're still doing that? - Gyro STL - 5/21 11:11:23
                    Still calling out hypocrisy, yes. You're dishonest. Nm - hokie VT - 5/21 11:12:21




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard