 |
|
Is it anymore clear where this was going?
Posted on: May 15, 2024 at 05:56:49 CT
Genco98 MU
Posts:
13281
Member For:
5.13 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
U.S. District Court Judge Colleen Lawless found that the university had violated Shannon’s civil rights.
The suspension, she ruled, deprived Shannon of “protected property interests” without due process. In the case of Shannon, whom the court noted is supporting several family members, his property interests include retaining his chances to be an NBA lottery pick — among the first 14 players taken in the draft — and to cash in on potential endorsements allowed under the NCAA’s name, image and likeness (NIL) policy.
“Plaintiff’s participation in sports is vital to the development of his career as well as his current and future economic opportunities considering plaintiff’s intention to declare for the 2024 NBA Draft,” Lawless wrote in the order issued Friday. “Prior to his suspension, plaintiff was projected to be a lottery pick in the NBA. His participation in future games impact his prospects in the draft and his earning potential.”
Again it's basketball. That's all he's doing. It's his future livelihood. Any of us would want to continue in our profession and avoid getting black balled if we felt we were wrongfully accused. Who cares if he plays? If you are that bothered by it don't watch.
The suspension, she ruled, deprived Shannon of “protected property interests” without due process. In the case of Shannon, whom the court noted is supporting several family members, his property interests include retaining his chances to be an NBA lottery pick — among the first 14 players taken in the draft — and to cash in on potential endorsements allowed under the NCAA’s name, image and likeness (NIL) policy.
“Plaintiff’s participation in sports is vital to the development of his career as well as his current and future economic opportunities considering plaintiff’s intention to declare for the 2024 NBA Draft,” Lawless wrote in the order issued Friday. “Prior to his suspension, plaintiff was projected to be a lottery pick in the NBA. His participation in future games impact his prospects in the draft and his earning potential.”
Again it's basketball. That's all he's doing. It's his future livelihood. Any of us would want to continue in our profession and avoid getting black balled if we felt we were wrongfully accused. Who cares if he plays? If you are that bothered by it don't watch.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
- 
Is it anymore clear where this was going? - Genco98 MU - 5/15 05:56:49