Welcome Guest

RE: I guess scotus can't intervene in a corrupt trial until

Posted on: May 7, 2024 at 09:00:02 CT

sarasotatiger MU

Posts:

23978

Member For:

13.35 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

the ruling on this, is that a gag order doesn't always violate the first amendment and the right to a fair trial. because in this case the social media statement can intimidate and a corrupted trial could happen. it goes both ways.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

I guess scotus can't intervene in a corrupt trial until - hokie VT - 5/6 20:26:13

Jesus Christ what a partisan hack you are - JG A - 5/7 12:38:45

RE: I guess scotus can't intervene in a corrupt trial until - sarasotatiger MU - 5/7 09:00:02

They could ask for an interlocutory appeal - Mormad MU - 5/6 21:11:57

They clearly are - Sal CMSU - 5/7 08:33:33

They are not unconstitutional because Trump said so. Why - hokie VT - 5/7 06:42:36

if trump was any other US citizen - JayHoaxH8r MU

- 5/7 07:34:20

It might be time for - GODZILLA MU - 5/7 09:02:43

RE: It might be time for you to - JayHoaxH8r MU

- 5/7 10:37:07

no - GODZILLA MU - 5/7 11:20:04

In general the plaintiff - MrTruman2U MU - 5/6 20:50:17

Seems odd that if the trial is as corrupt as it seems, - hokie VT - 5/7 06:40:25