lol do you read your own writing?
Posted on: April 24, 2024 at 16:29:45 CT
Sal CMSU
Posts:
229171
Member For:
21.85 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
-"he was not called to be a hostile witness" ... "none of which are in Trump's favor". Huh, so they wanted him to be a witness to not favor Trump? What would you call that, exactly?
-"he did" ... he did what, exactly? Again, you are clearly not comprehending what McCarthy is saying.
-"again he thinks the crime is the
check book journalism, its not. He fundamentally has no idea what Pecker is testifying for". Again ... what the hell are you talking about? McCarthy knows exactly what is in the indictment ... he's specifically addressing the alleged "crime" that Trump apparently covered up.
-"and again, clueless what happened yesterday and probably thurs and Fri. While this is all breathless for trumplicans to be indignant about, its a non argument about a non crime that nobody but nitwits thinks is occurring". This isn't a counterpoint to anything ... it's more rambling.
-"this guy is a total clueless idiot. This is not what the freaken case is aboot". This is the part of the case you're having an extremely tough time understanding. Bragg is trying to claim this is the crime that Trump tried covering up by lying on financial records.
-"this guy should be on trump's team he is so far off base on whats happening he would fit right in". Again, this is a counterpoint, it's further proof you are clueless of what's in the indictment. I can guarantee you McCarthy has read it numerous times and understands it better than you.