And one could argue that
Posted on: March 27, 2024 at 09:40:57 CT
4TigersinMichigan MU
Posts:
126941
Member For:
22.79 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
10
Your argument has been that collateral damage is the same as those who intentionally target civilians simply for the emotional damage of killing them. That is preposterous. Saying that is not an endorsement of collateral damage. Bit again, that is your comprehension issue.