 |
|
Obviously, the ladies here hate hypotheticals. But try this
Posted on: March 18, 2024 at 15:10:12 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
67514
Member For:
9.53 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
one.
Suppose there is a legitimate sworn enemy of the United States. It admits publicly, "it is our intent, and our plan to destroy the United States of America. To do so, we will be flooding the Internet and social media with our nation's propaganda and will convince your young people that the United States is a terrible place.
Not everything we say will be true, most of it will probably be fabricated including stories of America's historical crimes and sins, as well as totally fabricated stories of current evil doings by the United States."
And Suppose further, that that is widely known and understood, and the was carried on the front page of both the Washington post and the New York Times.
Must the United States by virtue of its constitution, allow that nation's propaganda on social media into our country targeted at our young people?
Now, of course, no one expects asstray, meat and the rest of the idiot's Little cult to answer the question. Certainly not with anything more than a mono syllabic response with no explanation or rationale. But to those of you capable of rational thought, is this something that we should allow, even welcome?
Please don't respond with a question, if you want to change the subject, feel free to start a new thread.
Edited by hokie at 15:16:22 on 03/18/24
Suppose there is a legitimate sworn enemy of the United States. It admits publicly, "it is our intent, and our plan to destroy the United States of America. To do so, we will be flooding the Internet and social media with our nation's propaganda and will convince your young people that the United States is a terrible place.
Not everything we say will be true, most of it will probably be fabricated including stories of America's historical crimes and sins, as well as totally fabricated stories of current evil doings by the United States."
And Suppose further, that that is widely known and understood, and the was carried on the front page of both the Washington post and the New York Times.
Must the United States by virtue of its constitution, allow that nation's propaganda on social media into our country targeted at our young people?
Now, of course, no one expects asstray, meat and the rest of the idiot's Little cult to answer the question. Certainly not with anything more than a mono syllabic response with no explanation or rationale. But to those of you capable of rational thought, is this something that we should allow, even welcome?
Please don't respond with a question, if you want to change the subject, feel free to start a new thread.
Edited by hokie at 15:16:22 on 03/18/24
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
Obviously, the ladies here hate hypotheticals. But try this - hokie VT - 3/18 15:10:12