Welcome Guest

owning multiple houses for residential purposes is fine...

Posted on: March 18, 2024 at 14:28:45 CT

zounami MU

Posts:

72138

Member For:

11.07 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

buying up houses on a large-scale for profit or turning residential single-family homes into commercial hotels is something most people do NOT want

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Middle class will be toast fairly soon. In 2023, 44% of - Diamond Dave MU

- 3/18 14:12:58

They are buying up the land with the the 401k fees and - shorty MU

- 3/18 18:52:43

Want another feel good corporate story? Here you go: - 90Tiger STL - 3/18 19:27:57

but hey, we gots a "right" to an education! (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 3/18 16:30:07

trumplican dreams can come true - JG MU

- 3/18 14:26:12

50+ % of U.S. Adults - Rabbit Test MU - 3/18 14:21:41

If you break up that 50% by their ethnicities.. - shorty MU

- 3/18 18:55:18

jews? (nm) - ashtray UF - 3/19 07:06:25

Cheer on the DOEd, national standards, no child - 90Tiger STL - 3/18 16:31:13

That's the fault of the dem's teachers union - RHAYWORTH MU - 3/18 15:01:14

thanks, public schools (nm) - Sal CMSU - 3/18 14:23:46

Congress needs to ban that, and force liquidation of those - zounami MU - 3/18 14:16:56

who should be allowed to buy a house?(nm) - meatiger MU - 3/18 14:17:51

It leads to them artificially inflating market price. - shorty MU

- 3/18 19:01:00

lol - JayHoaxH8r MU

- 3/19 08:33:54

it's about who should be excluded... like private equity - zounami MU - 3/18 14:19:34

How are those defined - meatiger MU - 3/18 14:22:35

yeah, that should be banned in residential areas (nm) - zounami MU - 3/18 14:26:02

I mean, no one wants commercial BnB's in their neighborhood - zounami MU - 3/18 14:27:28

no one?(nm) - meatiger MU - 3/18 14:28:39

other than the аssholes running them, no (nm) - zounami MU - 3/18 14:29:16

So a person should only be allowed to own one house? - meatiger MU - 3/18 14:27:09

owning multiple houses for residential purposes is fine... - zounami MU - 3/18 14:28:45

yeah, profits are evil (nm) - ashtray UF - 3/18 14:47:19

no, but sometimes regulations are needed (nm) - zounami MU - 3/18 14:53:11

Thanks Bernie (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 3/18 16:32:13

right, because too much profits are evil - ashtray UF - 3/18 14:55:35

what is the number? - meatiger MU - 3/18 14:29:42

That would be up to the legislators writing the bill. (nm) - zounami MU - 3/18 14:32:21

Are you against ride share companies as well?(nm) - meatiger MU - 3/18 14:37:24

no (nm) - zounami MU - 3/18 14:41:22

They hurt taxi drivers - meatiger MU - 3/18 14:44:06

That's competition, and it lowers costs for consumers. (nm) - zounami MU - 3/18 14:46:26

So if I sell my house - meatiger MU - 3/18 14:52:26

What if the legislators decide to not pass the bill?(nm) - meatiger MU - 3/18 14:36:15

Then the problem described in the OP will continue. (nm) - zounami MU - 3/18 14:37:19

so why can you not answer a simple question - meatiger MU - 3/18 14:37:59

It's not about number, it's about the buyer & their intended - zounami MU - 3/18 14:40:51

I think his post leads to conclusion that any number is fine - tman MU - 3/18 14:32:13

So now government should not only tell people - meatiger MU - 3/18 14:35:39

when those "people" are private equity firms, yes... - zounami MU - 3/18 14:39:34

what if they called themselves a RE investment group? - ashtray UF - 3/18 14:48:31

not for single-family residential homes (nm) - zounami MU - 3/18 14:53:31

so only one house per person - ashtray UF - 3/18 14:56:08

He will allow more than one - meatiger MU - 3/18 14:58:07

he's too smart for us (nm) - ashtray UF - 3/18 15:00:45

How does one define a private equity firm? - meatiger MU - 3/18 14:40:30

Those details would be defined in the bill. (nm) - zounami MU - 3/18 14:41:13

another avoidance - meatiger MU - 3/18 14:43:39

...like the Chinese did (nm) - zounami MU - 3/18 14:17:09

ban ownership(nm) - meatiger MU - 3/18 14:14:04