Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

I think they would strike it down cause th constitution sets

Posted on: March 5, 2024 at 14:05:20 CT
tigerinhogtown STL
Posts:
64027
Member For:
24.39 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
certain perameters (min age, nsturalized citizen, insurrection, etc.) and conditions to run for president. therefore it is solely the feds place to determine the conditions of PERSON to run for president.

Same would go if some state tried to put an upper age limit on running, it is the feds place to do so and it would take an ammendment to the constitution to do so.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

what if a state said all folks running for president had - tigerinhogtown STL - 3/5 12:27:07
     Don’t know but we do know this… - Outsider MU - 3/5 13:42:39
     they do now (nm) - ashtray UF - 3/5 13:10:48
     Is that one of the requirements spelled out in the - DHighlander NWMSU - 3/5 12:41:35
     That sounds like a great idea, and speaking to the - ummmm MU - 3/5 12:39:54
          I think they would strike it down cause th constitution sets - tigerinhogtown STL - 3/5 14:05:20
               no it doesn’t (nm) - pickle MU - 3/5 14:44:45
                    it doesn't what?(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 3/5 14:52:18
                         Good luck. He did a typical boring fly-by. He will never - tigerNkc KC - 3/5 19:15:20
                    It doesn't disqualify people found to be insurrectionists?(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 3/5 14:52:04
                    It doesn't require a president be a naturalized citizen?(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 3/5 14:50:42
                    It doesn't set a min age for President?(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 3/5 14:49:41
     Probably. The decision yesterday made clear... - Gyro MU - 3/5 12:36:05
          yesterday was specific - the state was ruling on something - tigerinhogtown STL - 3/5 13:49:52
          Yes, it seems like there's no autonomy for states to decide - DC Jayhawk KU - 3/5 13:13:11
               I hope you are playing along - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/5 13:15:08
                    I think that the SCOTUS ruling curtails it. - DC Jayhawk KU - 3/5 13:20:33
                         A simple challenge - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/5 13:22:41
                              Three examples? - DC Jayhawk KU - 3/5 13:48:56
                              It wasn't an advisory opinion. It ruled on the one issue in - ummmm MU - 3/5 13:29:40
                                   No, the assertion it did any more than that one - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/5 13:53:05
          Lol. Man you make a law degree from MU look bad.(nm) - DollarSigns MU - 3/5 13:00:13
               You are kidding, right? - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/5 13:03:11
                    Wait, are you kidding now? (nm) - ummmm MU - 3/5 13:03:51
                         I am - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/5 13:06:58
                              Lol, okay, yes correct. (nm) - ummmm MU - 3/5 13:11:06
          They can do things with the ballots - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/5 12:56:15
               like what? (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU - 3/5 13:23:56




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard