Welcome Guest

You can read the entire concurring opinion, where they

Posted on: March 4, 2024 at 11:21:58 CT
ummmm MU
Posts:
44844
Member For:
12.69 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
reference an "an oathbreaking insurrectionist" a few times.

These justices didn't dispute that or really find much in favor of Donald Trump; they made it known that their decision to join was premised on the fact that the 14th Amendment is an expansion of federal power and an invasion of state sovereignty. That's the long game.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     No, they are playing a much longer game: - ummmm MU - 3/4 11:05:53
          I just don't understand how people get this distrustful - Fire Marshall Bill MU - 3/4 11:11:34
               oh, dear. read this - pickle MU - 3/4 11:19:16
                    no(nm) - Fire Marshall Bill MU - 3/4 11:26:45
                         then remain ignorant. that’s your decision. - pickle MU - 3/4 11:27:52
                              I will at some point - Fire Marshall Bill MU - 3/4 11:47:49
                                   He will have other reading assignments for you after you - hokie VT - 3/4 12:19:24
                                        you’re a liar and a coward, hokie (nm) - pickle MU - 3/4 12:30:31
               What do you mean? That gold language in my post - ummmm MU - 3/4 11:14:05
                    "they are playing a much longer game" - Fire Marshall Bill MU - 3/4 11:15:42
                         You can read the entire concurring opinion, where they - ummmm MU - 3/4 11:21:58
                              so how do you think (or fear) this will serve as a precedent - Fire Marshall Bill MU - 3/4 11:27:41
                                   It won't serve as "further" invasion. You'll carefully - ummmm MU - 3/4 11:31:18




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard