 |
|
Nope. The judge erred in his findings
Posted on: February 28, 2024 at 07:41:06 CT
Spanky KU
Posts:
144956
Member For:
20.85 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Fraud must be proved by “clear, cogent, and convincing evidence”. The judge in Trump's case applied the lower 'preponderance of the evidence' standard.
“Clear, cogent, and convincing evidence” denotes a quantum of evidence or degree of proof greater than a mere preponderance, but something less than proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
“Clear, cogent, and convincing evidence” denotes a quantum of evidence or degree of proof greater than a mere preponderance, but something less than proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
Nope. The judge erred in his findings - Spanky KU - 2/28 07:41:06
-