Welcome Guest

Since when did Fox News anchors call NFL games? (nm)

Posted on: February 2, 2024 at 13:33:04 CT
MIZ45 KC
Posts:
36200
Member For:
15.88 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
(nm) means no message
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     JG you nailed it again, as always. my bad. (nm) - ashtray UF - 2/2 13:41:57
          Lol (nm) - MIZ45 MU - 2/2 13:46:49
          Lol ashtray patttin that mulleted head like a child(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 2/2 13:44:58
               sarcastic or no - JG MU - 2/2 13:45:59
          sweet - JG MU - 2/2 13:42:33
               So what you're saying is every American should cheer for the - MIZ45 MU - 2/2 13:46:35
     This is going to be classic. I hope Ashtry jumps - tman MU - 2/2 13:38:55
          Me too - JG MU - 2/2 13:40:00
     Since when did Fox News anchors call NFL games? (nm) - MIZ45 MU - 2/2 13:33:04
     Nobody is going to have a serious discussion with any - Wildcat KSU - 2/2 13:28:38
     Do you really think Fox's contract with Brady - Sal CMSU - 2/2 13:27:02
          How could it not? - JG MU - 2/2 13:30:21
               JG, if there were 10x the amount of dollars in supply - ummmm MU - 2/2 13:39:58
                    He won't get that inflation is caused by an artificial - tman MU - 2/2 13:42:31
                         Inflation IS an increase in the money supply. (nm) - ummmm MU - 2/2 13:51:42
                              he’s mentally ill (nm) - pickle MU - 2/2 13:59:50
                                   you two are not just ignorant - JG MU - 2/2 14:01:55
                                        Inflation is the increase in the supply of money. - ummmm MU - 2/2 14:04:31
                                             LOL NO - JG MU - 2/2 14:07:04
                                                  Lol, my god. - MIZ45 MU - 2/2 14:36:31
                                                  What is confusing about his post? (nm) - Sal CMSU - 2/2 14:11:41
                                                       nothing. its just wrong - JG MU - 2/2 14:51:35
                                                            because you have a simpleton's understanding of - ashtray UF - 2/2 15:02:20
                                                                 Unfortunately (for me) - JG MU - 2/2 15:07:42
                                                                      ok. you go with that (nm) - ashtray UF - 2/2 15:08:29
                                                                           Unlike so many of you, including you, - JG MU - 2/2 15:17:51
                              LOL NO - JG MU - 2/2 13:53:38
                         LOL it can be - JG MU - 2/2 13:44:37
                    LOL no - JG MU - 2/2 13:41:27
                         What example? (nm) - ummmm MU - 2/2 14:02:23
                              You should answer my question first - JG MU - 2/2 14:06:02
                                   Answered here: - ummmm MU - 2/2 14:06:35
                                        that is an incorrect definition - JG MU - 2/2 14:59:43
                                             So why aren't you providing the correct definition? (nm) - MIZ45 MU - 2/2 17:45:44
               BTW sal, this is an open google test. - JG MU - 2/2 13:34:50
                    I am not the one confused here (nm) - Sal CMSU - 2/2 14:02:18
                         I'd say you are way beyond confused, way beyond mere - JG MU - 2/2 14:04:05




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard