 |
|
What he wrote was ambiguous. It could be taken in 2
Posted on: November 28, 2023 at 17:25:06 CT
JeffB MU
Posts:
70105
Member For:
20.96 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
different ways.
I would assert that his point was not a solid one for either possible meaning.
If he meant that it is no one's business what the Nashville shooter wrote in his/her manifesto I certainly disagree. The police/sheriff's department is a government office whose salaries and other expenses are paid by the taxpayers in that jurisdiction. Those taxpayers have a right to see what evidence their employees have collected.
If he meant that it is no one's business that someone was posting threats to rape and kill people on the internet, then I obviously disagree with that assertion as well.
I would assert that his point was not a solid one for either possible meaning.
If he meant that it is no one's business what the Nashville shooter wrote in his/her manifesto I certainly disagree. The police/sheriff's department is a government office whose salaries and other expenses are paid by the taxpayers in that jurisdiction. Those taxpayers have a right to see what evidence their employees have collected.
If he meant that it is no one's business that someone was posting threats to rape and kill people on the internet, then I obviously disagree with that assertion as well.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
What he wrote was ambiguous. It could be taken in 2 - JeffB MU - 11/28 17:25:06