First of all the extreme high temperatures

Posted on: November 20, 2023 at 23:28:52 CT

that are assumed caused by the jet fuel were not borne out by any factual physical evidence. Not any.
It is contradicted by the people hanging out the open building not being "melted".
The Fire captain (don't recall his name) that died but was on scene was busy making plans to fight the fire- which also contradicts the super high temperature claim.

If the top say 18 or even 40 floors were damaged the
collapse would have only crushed an equal weight of floors. The famous cinder block and snowman video which
virtually none of this board understood or are even capable of understanding.

Nor does the high temperature by jet fuel theory
explain nor account for the molten metal in the rubble
for weeks after the collapse.

And the pancake theory was specifically rejected.

And of course he realizes the weakness of his theory by pointing out WTC 7.

All this was discussed (well by me, sang and danced about by most) decades ago.


PS I did notice you ignored my thoughtful response you specifically axed for yesterday.

Edited by JG at 23:29:58 on 11/20/23