 |
|
Comparing quid pro quos (bribes)
Posted on: September 29, 2023 at 13:01:57 CT
JG MU
Posts:
255568
Member For:
21.52 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
112
China vs China.
One is pretty much nonsense, didn't happen while defendant was in office, and didn't result in any policy change.
The other clearly resulted in both policy change and benefit of an offspring.
Ukraine vs Ukraine.
one defendant spearheaded a widespread want of a change, but the narrative that it benefitted an offspring is pretty much a lie. The other clearly tried to pressure
a quid pro quo to personally benefit himself.
Nothing vs Saudi Arabia. One defendant protected Saudi Arabia from a clear murder. Then we sold them hundreds of millions of dollars to atttack Yemenis. The final result is that an offspring got BILLIONS of dollars of
money he was totally unqualified for.
Nothing vs Russia. The collusion was obvious
Well there you have it. Both are clearly guilty of corruption and bribery but one not even 1/10th of the level of the other. While one the clown show has investigated nonstop (ignoring all other areas of governance ) and found not one shred to tie the defendant to. The other side with much more obvious evidence
remains curiously incurious to even look at the massive evidence.
one is 4th tier level of injustice , the other is 5th tier.
Edited by JG at 13:04:00 on 09/29/23
One is pretty much nonsense, didn't happen while defendant was in office, and didn't result in any policy change.
The other clearly resulted in both policy change and benefit of an offspring.
Ukraine vs Ukraine.
one defendant spearheaded a widespread want of a change, but the narrative that it benefitted an offspring is pretty much a lie. The other clearly tried to pressure
a quid pro quo to personally benefit himself.
Nothing vs Saudi Arabia. One defendant protected Saudi Arabia from a clear murder. Then we sold them hundreds of millions of dollars to atttack Yemenis. The final result is that an offspring got BILLIONS of dollars of
money he was totally unqualified for.
Nothing vs Russia. The collusion was obvious
Well there you have it. Both are clearly guilty of corruption and bribery but one not even 1/10th of the level of the other. While one the clown show has investigated nonstop (ignoring all other areas of governance ) and found not one shred to tie the defendant to. The other side with much more obvious evidence
remains curiously incurious to even look at the massive evidence.
one is 4th tier level of injustice , the other is 5th tier.
Edited by JG at 13:04:00 on 09/29/23
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
Comparing quid pro quos (bribes) - JG MU - 9/29 13:01:57