Welcome Guest

Why do you think it was DOJ?

Posted on: June 27, 2023 at 17:01:18 CT
Ace AU
Posts:
28235
Member For:
5.28 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
72
The owner of the tapes recorded the Bedminster meeting with Trump's knowledge.

The meeting included two Trump staffers, the ghost writer for Mark Meadows' book and perhaps the publisher.

There are multiple recordings of the same meeting - one from the Trump staffer and another by the writer/publisher.


Donald Trump’s legal team turned over multiple recordings of the former president’s interviews with members of the media and book authors to federal prosecutors during their investigation, according to sources familiar with the matter.

Special counsel Jack Smith disclosed in a court filing Wednesday that investigators had more tapes of interviews with Trump conducted by non-government entities and recorded with his consent but did not say what the tapes said or how they were obtained.

The new reporting provides more insight into how the special counsel conducted its investigation and what kinds of evidence it has. Prosecutors are required to turn over all of the evidence they have collected to Trump’s defense team, even if it is not going to be used in the case at trial.


The special counsel previously revealed it obtained audio of an interview Trump gave at Bedminster for Mark Meadows’ memoir in which the special counsel says Trump shared classified information with visitors and aides.

Edited by Ace at 17:04:59 on 06/27/23
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Why is DOJ leaking evidence - Spanky KU - 6/27 15:55:42
     Why do you think it was DOJ? - Ace AU - 6/27 17:01:18
          The most likely suspect would be the - JG A - 6/27 18:03:45
               exactly. But Spanked won't acknowledge that. - Ace AU - 6/27 18:24:51
                    Spanked is a dedicated liar hypocrite , so typical beaker - JG A - 6/27 18:27:56
          Because Lawfare Spokesman… - kp83 MU - 6/27 17:43:21
          Bedminster? Bedminster? Oh yeah if we - JG A - 6/27 17:14:50
     because it furthers someone's political goals(nm) - cnk ATL - 6/27 16:37:09
          ^^^^ 50 yard line.(nm) - Toger STL - 6/27 16:40:34
               it's the only reason the DOJ ever leaks evidence(nm) - cnk ATL - 6/27 17:05:57
     Who leaked it? - JayHoaxH8r MU - 6/27 16:16:50
          Not Trump - Spanky KU - 6/27 16:31:52
               well your fauxnews seemed to think he did - JayHoaxH8r MU - 6/27 16:53:57
               RE: Not Trump - tigerdb MU - 6/27 16:32:56
                    Spanky calls that a proclamation.(nm) - Toger STL - 6/27 16:34:04
                         No. Spanky calls that logic(nm) - Spanky KU - 6/27 16:38:40
                              logic is for the criminal defense team to get the bad news - tigerdb MU - 6/27 16:42:02
                                   History shows the DOJ leaking Trump evidence - Spanky KU - 6/27 17:37:22
                                        Which DOJer has been leaking? - JayHoaxH8r MU - 6/27 21:37:37
                                   that actually makes sense - JayHoaxH8r MU - 6/27 16:58:42
          Maybe it was Gaetz - Sal CMSU - 6/27 16:26:21
               Vindman - JayHoaxH8r MU - 6/27 16:54:40
                    He swore under oath he wasn’t the whistleblower - Sal CMSU - 6/27 17:06:29
               lol(nm) - Th8tnTiger MU - 6/27 16:30:52
     smiths case is collapsing(nm) - Th8tnTiger MU - 6/27 16:14:00
          Which one?(nm) - Toger STL - 6/27 16:16:57
     Some say trump people leaked it. - Toger STL - 6/27 16:13:58
          Who would those people be, JG? Your fellow Leftists - - Reagan STL - 6/27 16:26:14
               RE: Who would those people be, JG? Your fellow Leftists - - Toger STL - 6/27 16:28:50
          It was leaked to CNN first. Now, who would that likely be? - BH O'bonga MU - 6/27 16:20:54
               haberman works for cnn right? - JayHoaxH8r MU - 6/27 16:55:21
               The CNN Town Hall crew?(nm) - Toger STL - 6/27 16:22:01
     2 party consent? - tigerdb MU - 6/27 16:12:05
     To counteract Trump’s lies and to inform you. - namres MU - 6/27 16:07:48
          Isn’t that what the trial is for? (nm) - Sal CMSU - 6/27 16:09:17
     Because the CIA just gave 6 billion dollars to Russia (nm) - Columbian Gold MU - 6/27 16:04:30
     Federal law requires one-party consent(nm) - Rabbit Test MU - 6/27 15:59:46
     Maybe they aren’t - Sal CMSU - 6/27 15:57:19




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard