Welcome Guest

Mizzou probably won’t have that

Posted on: June 7, 2023 at 14:07:53 CT

wu-tangtiger MU

Posts:

65909

Member For:

11.02 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

Kobe and Hodge are huge losses.

I think the staff adequately replaced the combination of Hodge, Gholston and Gomillion with Bates, Grill, Lewis and Tonje. Mizzou is deeper up front but a little worse with Kobe gone.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Up Front: Lose Mo & DeGray, Gain Connor & Jesus. Does - Sigma MU - 6/7 13:03:47

If you're comparing those players, in a landslide IMO - Eggs MU - 6/7 14:07:38

Debatable about hitting 3’s on the 2 transfers listed. - wu-tangtiger MU - 6/7 14:25:31

7-27 last year between the 2, not much of a sample size - Eggs MU - 6/7 14:39:30

32% could be viewded as borderline acceptable - longtimereader MU - 6/7 16:58:38

I think it will come down to minutes - wu-tangtiger MU - 6/7 17:03:31

I know you've seen the film on Conner shooting 3’s - El Zorro MU - 6/7 14:28:28

He’s a 32% shooter from 3 - wu-tangtiger MU - 6/7 14:33:46

So better than Xavier Pinson (nm) - ChinaTiger KC - 6/7 14:40:59

Pinson is also 32% from 3 - wu-tangtiger MU - 6/7 14:45:18

also gain Butler and Pierce(nm) - MizzouAstro MU

- 6/7 13:47:19

I don't think combined they will equal Kobe's loss, so - Sigma MU - 6/7 13:55:40

Pierce went from 6'8" to 6'10" when he signed(nm) - alstl MU - 6/7 13:53:22

Unheard of . A 16 y/o to grow 2 inches in a few monthes. (nm) - longtimereader MU - 6/7 17:01:34

Spineless retard (nm) - zoomer 99 - 6/7 14:37:50

You left Kobe off the lose list (nm) - wu-tangtiger MU - 6/7 13:18:54

Was looking only at net effect of portal on front line.(nm) - Sigma MU - 6/7 13:20:43

Then you are at a Net positive at that spot - wu-tangtiger MU - 6/7 13:29:49

we also lost an all-sec player up front(nm) - TigerA MU - 6/7 13:16:35

Net effect on portal on front line(nm) - Sigma MU - 6/7 13:22:36

why focus on something that isn't the whole picture?(nm) - TigerA MU - 6/7 13:48:06

Most programs want to have a NET advantage from portal. - Sigma MU - 6/7 13:53:30

all teams want a NET advantage from one year to the next(nm) - TigerA MU - 6/7 13:56:41

Mizzou probably won’t have that - wu-tangtiger MU - 6/7 14:07:53

I see the reverse, being deeper at wings/guards & thinner - Sigma MU - 6/7 14:16:17

I think Mizzou is deeper across the board - wu-tangtiger MU - 6/7 14:20:45

Hodge shooting & steals will be missed as they generally led - Sigma MU - 6/7 14:26:30

Each year can bring different dynamics and tradeoffs that - longtimereader MU - 6/7 17:05:20

The steals dynamic is rare and hard to prepare - Sigma MU - 6/7 17:39:57

Caleb Grill does (nm) - Uncle John MU

- 6/7 17:56:52

Grill, Tonje and Lewis all have it to some degree - wu-tangtiger MU - 6/7 18:15:00

This should be a better defensive team (nm) - Uncle John MU

- 6/7 18:31:50

You do wonder if the staff is willing to trade - wu-tangtiger MU - 6/7 14:40:38

agree(nm) - TigerA MU - 6/7 14:11:17

That's why the in OP the question was asked. I still - Sigma MU - 6/7 14:05:27

You can’t or shouldn’t just look at those players by themsel - wu-tangtiger MU - 6/7 14:18:36

I'm factoring in team needs in addition to talent level. - Sigma MU - 6/7 14:24:39

Vanover in the SEC averaged 5/3/1 - wu-tangtiger MU - 6/7 14:29:29

Your Stats: Mo matched him in rebounds. What yr are - Sigma MU - 6/7 14:34:57

I used all of Vanover’s conference stats - wu-tangtiger MU - 6/7 14:44:20

Mo is still a project - El Zorro MU - 6/7 13:15:31