Welcome Guest

Why didn't Durham subpoena/interview comey, strzok and

Posted on: May 18, 2023 at 16:32:45 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
64266
Member For:
8.91 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
the FIB Director?

Why were no indictments recommended in 307 pages of detailed listings of malfeasance, corruption and possibly treason?

That report starts to take on the look of a compromise, a deal, a political document, where some things will be acknowledged, while others must remain hidden.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Why didn't Durham subpoena/interview comey, strzok and - hokie VT - 5/18 16:32:45
     Nothing there dumbsht(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 5/18 18:31:24
     LOL the investigation to look at FBI wrongdoing - JG A - 5/18 16:59:34
          RE: LOL the investigation to look at FBI wrongdoing - Catturd USMC - 5/18 17:14:28
          Watch some lying hypocrite whine about - JG A - 5/18 17:00:27
          Who did Mueller convict for Russian collusion?(nm) - Spanky KU - 5/18 16:56:30
               RE: Who did Mueller convict for Russian collusion?(nm) - sarasotatiger MU - 5/18 18:01:10
                    Russia colluded with Hillary campaign - Spanky KU - 5/18 18:16:34
                         RE: Russia colluded with Hillary campaign - sarasotatiger MU - 5/18 18:30:52
                              Fact: Steele Dossier was Russian disinformation - Spanky KU - 5/18 18:56:04
               Mueller wasn't prosecuting. DOJ was. Manafort comes to mind - Ace AU - 5/18 17:05:07
                    Manafort was not prosecuted for Russia collusion - Spanky KU - 5/18 17:08:24




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard