Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

why should we automatically believe he didn't? (nm)

Posted on: December 13, 2022 at 15:21:03 CT
ashtray UF
Posts:
111045
Member For:
21.88 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
(nm) means no message
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Lib super donor SBF was a fraud and hoped he'd get the - tigertix MU - 12/13 12:49:25
     indeed, he donated to dems and repubs alike - JG A - 12/13 13:08:25
          RE: indeed, he donated to dems and repubs alike - MOCO SON MU - 12/13 15:05:23
          not on the same scale... not even close (nm) - zounami MU - 12/13 13:14:04
               LOl not according to the donor - JG A - 12/13 13:14:44
                    he seems like a reliable source (nm) - Sal CMSU - 12/13 14:01:21
          Way more to dems according to the records - Sal CMSU - 12/13 13:13:06
               The small amount given to R's was for the very talking point - zounami MU - 12/13 13:15:41
                    And it worked like a charm. There are always low info, low - DHighlander NWMSU - 12/13 13:53:19
                         There was an FTX executive that donated to the GOP - Sal CMSU - 12/13 13:55:15
                    this is one of the more stupid narratives out there - ashtray UF - 12/13 13:24:22
                    RE: The small amount given to R's was for the very talking point - JG A - 12/13 13:21:14
                         welp ... "unless you believe the words of a fraudster" (nm) - Sal CMSU - 12/13 13:43:31
                         Lol @ sal - mizzoumurfkc KC - 12/13 13:30:42
                              You should try reading posts before jumping in blind (nm) - Sal CMSU - 12/13 13:50:21
                                   Lol oh I saw Sal... - mizzoumurfkc KC - 12/13 14:55:28
                                        Why should we automatically believe a fraudster's word? - Sal CMSU - 12/13 15:01:50
                                             why should we automatically believe he didn't? (nm) - ashtray UF - 12/13 15:21:03
                                                  It's a safe bet to believe the opposite of what he says - Sal CMSU - 12/13 15:25:23
                                                       the FEC will probably investigate it - ashtray UF - 12/13 15:27:55
                                                            I have no doubt he donated to the GOP - Sal CMSU - 12/13 15:31:31
                                                                 Well, he's being charged with the dark money scheme - ashtray UF - 12/13 15:43:15
                                             You automatically don't believe him because - mizzoumurfkc KC - 12/13 15:12:02
                                                  I never said either side doesn't get dark money - Sal CMSU - 12/13 15:22:27
               LOL that would be you Sal - JG A - 12/13 13:13:55
     Game's not over. He may still get a sweet deal. - RHAYWORTH MU - 12/13 13:03:33
          Or he could get the Epstein treatment. Either way when you - DHighlander NWMSU - 12/13 13:06:47




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard