Welcome Guest

Correct. I would not be surprised if their anonymous

Posted on: October 13, 2022 at 11:05:03 CT

Spanky KU

Posts:

142195

Member For:

20.35 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

sources never had access to the information they “leaked”. The “leaks” were simply Dem propaganda with no truth at all and the liberal media lapped it up and never even tried to verify prior to publishing

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

No leaks from Durham investigation, but Mueller, - Spanky KU - 10/13 10:37:49

No downside to lying for Trump. Huge risk for telling the - JG A - 10/13 11:43:55

I think you have Trump confused with Clinton - Spanky KU - 10/13 13:05:16

No leaks from Durham: True. Auten's testimony was damning - BH O'bonga MU - 10/13 11:01:54

Durham leaked - JayHoaxH8r MU

- 10/13 11:15:56

So you agree. Zero anonymous leaks from Durham - Spanky KU - 10/13 12:37:41

Talking points are out(nm) - Wildcat KSU - 10/13 11:37:10

Hoax thinks a mislabeled court filing with actual evidence - Spanky KU - 10/13 13:20:15

So he's just a lazy sloppy attorney - JayHoaxH8r MU

- 10/13 14:03:55

Durham can't even get his witnesses to testi-lie correctly - JayHoaxH8r MU

- 10/13 10:43:48

Haha! That never seems to stop the Dems. (nm) - Outsider MU - 10/13 10:45:40

Yep. Hoax is a true believer in anonymous leaks that - Spanky KU - 10/13 11:02:20

poor spanked - JayHoaxH8r MU

- 10/13 11:10:54

Hoax is the board’s b^tch - Spanky KU - 10/13 12:46:09

You really hurting today - JayHoaxH8r MU

- 10/13 12:59:41

Tsk, tsk, tsk - Spanky KU - 10/13 13:06:10

Dem leaks make the news and the longer they - Outsider MU - 10/13 10:43:31

Correct. I would not be surprised if their anonymous - Spanky KU - 10/13 11:05:03

Same reason we don't know about the SCOTUS leaker. nm - hokie VT - 10/13 10:41:24