As is usually the case, it is a direct and obvious example

Posted on: August 28, 2022 at 06:10:16 CT

Of him committing a crime where his only loophole defense will be his own gross incompetence and lack of credibility in understanding how anything works. Time after time his overwhelming stupidity is used to his advantage because it is unreasonable to hold him to the standards of a normal person. While that may, and has been, successful as a defense in each individual example at some point in my opinion one has to look at them in aggregate. If he can never do anything properly and is always violating laws and processes because he is too stupid then one of the examples needs to stick to prevent him from continuing. Gross incompetency is not a shield for one’s entire life of perpetual unaccountablility.