Welcome Guest

Sign In | Register

So, the redacted affidavit is quite compelling

Posted on: August 26, 2022 at 12:19:16 CT

Ace UNC

Posts:

28905

Member For:

6.02 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

0

the information in the documents risked national security

the documents need not be classified to violate law:

https://twitter.com/gtconway3d/status/1563210553228554240

There was obstruction (as evidenced by written communication from Trump's attorneys).

More analysis to come

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

So, the redacted affidavit is quite compelling - Ace AU - 8/26 12:19:16

RE: So, the redacted affidavit is quite compelling - Tigrrrr! MU

- 8/26 12:44:56

A sandbox fight between Trump and the national archives? - redngray MU - 8/26 12:40:37

They need criminal intent in order to violate the law(nm) - Spanky KU - 8/26 12:29:54

Would that convince you?(nm) - Toger STL - 8/26 13:14:50

Not all cases need criminal intent. You don't need intent - MizzouTigerz MU

- 8/26 12:33:47

the specific ones in question do (nm) - Sal CMSU - 8/26 13:02:07

This one does however(nm) - tman MU - 8/26 12:36:18

In your opinion, which is based on hearsay. - MizzouTigerz MU

- 8/26 12:29:29

Counselor, you know better than to assert a theory as fact - Ace AU - 8/26 12:57:31

Why did the FBI insist on improved security if there were no - MizzouTigerz MU

- 8/27 05:18:57

i mean they did cite that a CBS Miami news crew reportedly - blake1771 MU - 8/26 12:23:15

Clandestine operations were put at risk - Ace AU - 8/26 12:29:11

No they weren't - Sal CMSU - 8/26 13:06:34

Lort - JayHoaxH8r MU

- 8/26 13:07:29

We all know you and logic don't go well together (nm) - Sal CMSU - 8/26 13:14:50

We'll see if your 'logic' applies to other cases - JayHoaxH8r MU

- 8/26 13:22:05

RE: So, the redacted affidavit is quite compelling - dangertim MU

- 8/26 12:22:16

©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy About Tigerboard