 |
|
RE: Canadian doctor death conspiracy tards
Posted on: July 25, 2022 at 17:25:43 CT
MUTGR MU
Posts:
67167
Member For:
24.04 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
2
"Last August, my husband was diagnosed with Stage 4 Gastric Cancer Signet Ring Adenocarcinoma, which had spread beyond the gastric wall into his peritoneal cavity. He had minimal symptoms, no risk factors and did not have cancer genetics in his family. Lintis Plastica is an aggressive form of stomach cancer and only presents symptoms once the disease has advanced."
A young fit person with few symptoms, no risk factors or family history of cancer is diagnosed in August of 2021 with stage 4 of very aggressive cancer and you cite this as proof the vaccines had no possible connection?
https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=246438
The following is a discussion of a lancet paper showing covid 19 vaccines harms peoples innate immunity, which includes the ability to fight off cancer cells:
"If you refused the jabs and got the virus (as I did) you did get that immunity, and while you may well get it again (gee, you get colds once in a while, don't you?) it is a near-certainty won't get seriously ill or die. Exactly as would have occurred if there were no jabs, and exactly as did occur more than 100 years ago when OC43 showed up and, we believe, caused a pandemic in the 1890s almost identical in character to Covid.
A reminder: mRNA is not a new discovery. Moderna had been trying to use it for various therapeutic reasons, including cancer, for over a decade. Why cancer? Two reasons: Its very lucrative, obviously, and the margins for safety are much wider because cancer, untreated, is almost universally-fatal, so side effects are tolerated with cancer treatments that never would be for anything else. The technology never worked; it repeatedly failed either on efficacy, safety or frequently both.
Further, "vector vaccine" technology is in fact relatively new. This in turn means we do not know what potential long-term problems it may cause but we do know that attempting to use modified adenoviruses you were previously exposed to may be worthless in a given person as you may have existing recognition and thus immunity to the vector. Worse, the potential for reassortment between viral species of the same basic structure is a known phenomena; indeed it is one of the primary mutational drivers among viruses and the use of viral vector Covid vaccines thus may be responsible for the recent Hepatitis problem because there is an adenovirus link to Hepatitis that is known. Again, without decades-long experience to identify said potential problems and run them to the ground with that technology we jabbed people on a mass-basis.
It gets worse. This was just published in Nature, and thus one cannot argue its "mere opinion" or a "conspiracy theory" since it went through the journal's review process. It is no longer mere speculation that the jabs could wind up causing serious immune damage -- and that said damage may well be permanent.
Recently, The Lancet published a study on the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines and the waning of immunity with time. The study showed that immune function among vaccinated individuals 8 months after the administration of two doses of COVID-19 vaccine was lower than that among the unvaccinated individuals. According to European Medicines Agency recommendations, frequent COVID-19 booster shots could adversely affect the immune response and may not be feasible.
....
These clinical alterations may explain the association reported between COVID-19 vaccination and shingles.
Notice a problem in that language -- the damage isn't specific to Covid and it is not transient either as one might expect from an immune challenge by vaccination (or infection) -- even at eight months, likely the duration of the study, immune impairment from these jabs was persistent. That's extraordinarily bad, and exactly why you don't rush out new things without testing over a long period of time so you can not just find such potential problems but definitively run them into the ground before you go stabbing a couple hundred million people in America alone and billions more world-wide.
The impact may be irreversible and notice that the article talks about mitigating rather than reversing the impact, specifically limiting other drugs that might otherwise suppress or interfere with immune function even on a short-term basis. May I remind you that beyond the impact when it comes to being impaired in fighting off other diseases every single person on the planet today has cancerous cells in their body and it is your immune system that keeps those in check and prevents you from developing clinical cancer. If this damage is permanent then your lifetime cancer risk has been permanently and materially increased, perhaps by a LOT."
Excess deaths (above average for pickle) are way up over prior years INCLUDING 2020 and include many deaths in young people from aggressive cancers, not to mention heart attacks, blood clots, and a litany of other problems which are increasingly being linked to the experimental jabs.
Edited by MUTGR at 17:29:15 on 07/25/22
A young fit person with few symptoms, no risk factors or family history of cancer is diagnosed in August of 2021 with stage 4 of very aggressive cancer and you cite this as proof the vaccines had no possible connection?
https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=246438
The following is a discussion of a lancet paper showing covid 19 vaccines harms peoples innate immunity, which includes the ability to fight off cancer cells:
"If you refused the jabs and got the virus (as I did) you did get that immunity, and while you may well get it again (gee, you get colds once in a while, don't you?) it is a near-certainty won't get seriously ill or die. Exactly as would have occurred if there were no jabs, and exactly as did occur more than 100 years ago when OC43 showed up and, we believe, caused a pandemic in the 1890s almost identical in character to Covid.
A reminder: mRNA is not a new discovery. Moderna had been trying to use it for various therapeutic reasons, including cancer, for over a decade. Why cancer? Two reasons: Its very lucrative, obviously, and the margins for safety are much wider because cancer, untreated, is almost universally-fatal, so side effects are tolerated with cancer treatments that never would be for anything else. The technology never worked; it repeatedly failed either on efficacy, safety or frequently both.
Further, "vector vaccine" technology is in fact relatively new. This in turn means we do not know what potential long-term problems it may cause but we do know that attempting to use modified adenoviruses you were previously exposed to may be worthless in a given person as you may have existing recognition and thus immunity to the vector. Worse, the potential for reassortment between viral species of the same basic structure is a known phenomena; indeed it is one of the primary mutational drivers among viruses and the use of viral vector Covid vaccines thus may be responsible for the recent Hepatitis problem because there is an adenovirus link to Hepatitis that is known. Again, without decades-long experience to identify said potential problems and run them to the ground with that technology we jabbed people on a mass-basis.
It gets worse. This was just published in Nature, and thus one cannot argue its "mere opinion" or a "conspiracy theory" since it went through the journal's review process. It is no longer mere speculation that the jabs could wind up causing serious immune damage -- and that said damage may well be permanent.
Recently, The Lancet published a study on the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines and the waning of immunity with time. The study showed that immune function among vaccinated individuals 8 months after the administration of two doses of COVID-19 vaccine was lower than that among the unvaccinated individuals. According to European Medicines Agency recommendations, frequent COVID-19 booster shots could adversely affect the immune response and may not be feasible.
....
These clinical alterations may explain the association reported between COVID-19 vaccination and shingles.
Notice a problem in that language -- the damage isn't specific to Covid and it is not transient either as one might expect from an immune challenge by vaccination (or infection) -- even at eight months, likely the duration of the study, immune impairment from these jabs was persistent. That's extraordinarily bad, and exactly why you don't rush out new things without testing over a long period of time so you can not just find such potential problems but definitively run them into the ground before you go stabbing a couple hundred million people in America alone and billions more world-wide.
The impact may be irreversible and notice that the article talks about mitigating rather than reversing the impact, specifically limiting other drugs that might otherwise suppress or interfere with immune function even on a short-term basis. May I remind you that beyond the impact when it comes to being impaired in fighting off other diseases every single person on the planet today has cancerous cells in their body and it is your immune system that keeps those in check and prevents you from developing clinical cancer. If this damage is permanent then your lifetime cancer risk has been permanently and materially increased, perhaps by a LOT."
Excess deaths (above average for pickle) are way up over prior years INCLUDING 2020 and include many deaths in young people from aggressive cancers, not to mention heart attacks, blood clots, and a litany of other problems which are increasingly being linked to the experimental jabs.
Edited by MUTGR at 17:29:15 on 07/25/22
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
- 
RE: Canadian doctor death conspiracy tards - MUTGR MU - 7/25 17:25:43