Welcome Guest

I believe things not expressly prohibited, are allowed. Nm

Posted on: May 10, 2022 at 08:50:38 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
68174
Member For:
9.66 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
10
..
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     Article IV, Section 2, Clause 1 of the Constitution - Spanky KU - 5/10 12:13:21
     Wouldn't freedom of assembly require this?(nm) - o'lineydisciple MU - 5/10 09:42:18
     Why did you only say us citizens - meatiger MU - 5/10 09:21:15
          No - gmmm98 MU - 5/10 09:42:15
          i was curious - gmmm98 MU - 5/10 09:17:43
               I said that act protects the right for citizens to freely - tcat KC - 5/10 09:25:24
                    ...a congressional power(nm) - gmmm98 MU - 5/10 09:29:56
                         More like a clarification - tcat KC - 5/10 09:35:34
                              I'm not saying they are nazis - gmmm98 MU - 5/10 09:50:29
                                   Please tell how I am wrong? What magical document - tcat KC - 5/10 10:00:19
                                        there is no god - gmmm98 MU - 5/10 10:20:13
     Yes, - tcat KC - 5/10 08:55:14
     do you mean it is protected from govt by the constitution? - SwampTiger MU - 5/10 08:53:41
          of course - gmmm98 MU - 5/10 09:05:17
     Yes. - ummmm MU - 5/10 08:51:14
          Is there an agreed-upon list of natural rights? And who - hokie VT - 5/10 08:54:38
               Our rights come from government - meatiger MU - 5/10 09:16:35
                    You sure make a strong argument with that post. nm - hokie VT - 5/10 09:20:32
                         It just shows your ignorance - meatiger MU - 5/10 09:22:45
                              Before government codified rights and laws, "rights" were - hokie VT - 5/10 09:30:54
                                   Government - meatiger MU - 5/10 09:34:00
               It's not "agreed upon" but there is a definitive list - ummmm MU - 5/10 08:55:53
                    So if they're not agreed upon, who has decided that they are - hokie VT - 5/10 09:12:59
                         No one has "decided" that they are rights. They are - ummmm MU - 5/10 09:27:50
                              This has been explained to you before: - ummmm MU - 5/10 09:29:37
                         A perfect hokie post. - kmawv8 MU - 5/10 09:14:50
                              Care to debate my post or just bjtch about it? Proclaim my - hokie VT - 5/10 09:18:14
                                   I didn't b*tch about anything. - kmawv8 MU - 5/10 09:22:46
                                        No, you commented ABOUT my post. You didn't have the - hokie VT - 5/10 09:27:12
                                             Just for fun: - kmawv8 MU - 5/10 10:01:04
                                             You asked a bunch of questions that have been - kmawv8 MU - 5/10 09:32:13
                                                  The concepts are just a tad too abstract for him. - ummmm MU - 5/10 09:38:51
                                                       Sure, but that little bit of entertainment goes away - kmawv8 MU - 5/10 09:47:06
                    How Lockean of you. Jefferson replaced "estate" with - SparkyStalcup MU - 5/10 09:08:42
                         They're the same thing. (nm) - ummmm MU - 5/10 09:18:14
     I believe things not expressly prohibited, are allowed. Nm - hokie VT - 5/10 08:50:38
          Someone has read the 9th amendment. Good. nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 5/10 08:54:29
               That's not what the 9th Amendment says. (nm) - ummmm MU - 5/10 08:54:59
                    True that. I was making an inference that hokie might - SparkyStalcup MU - 5/10 08:58:52




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard