Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

I was specific enough for you to call me a liar. But you

Posted on: May 6, 2022 at 10:51:07 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
68167
Member For:
9.66 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
are not capable of supporting your own allegation so now you’re back to name-calling.

With murph, the idiot trained seal applauding your every move. While typically, offering no specifics, no details, no facts and no actual commentary.

Knowing him and his limited intellectual abilities, that’s probably the best course of action.

Edited by hokie at 10:51:56 on 05/06/22
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Roberts says right thing. What of Obama’s lesbian gorillas? - hokie VT - 5/6 10:05:44
     The leak is a nice cover for the Pfizer deaths during - shorty MU - 5/6 11:12:34
          The leak is a distraction for all the administration’s - hokie VT - 5/6 11:18:55
     The person behind this knows exactly what they - Outsider MU - 5/6 10:49:12
     Nm - Tburger MU - 5/6 10:27:27
          Can you be more specific? Or do you just want to call names? - hokie VT - 5/6 10:28:48
               Sure - DC Jayhawk KU - 5/6 10:50:32
                    Those were conclusions drawn from their refusal to condemn - hokie VT - 5/6 10:54:28
               Nm - Tburger MU - 5/6 10:36:13
                    I was specific enough for you to call me a liar. But you - hokie VT - 5/6 10:51:07
                    Sorry to bother you, I thought you might engage. Nm - hokie VT - 5/6 10:45:31
                    So the twitter thread calling for the assassination of sever - Tigrrrr! MU - 5/6 10:45:24
                         It was a gaming editor in the UK - DC Jayhawk KU - 5/6 10:51:43
                              And? - Tigrrrr! MU - 5/6 10:55:51
                                   I think that the distinction between - DC Jayhawk KU - 5/6 11:07:22
                         Nm - Tburger MU - 5/6 10:49:44
                              It's the same type of bullsh*t rhetoric that triggered - Tigrrrr! MU - 5/6 10:55:07
                                   Nm - Tburger MU - 5/6 10:58:32
                                        You may want to try posting multiple sentences in a - hokie VT - 5/6 11:02:12
                                             Nm - Tburger MU - 5/6 11:03:12
                                                  Nothing. Thanx for stopping by. You may go now. Nm - hokie VT - 5/6 11:05:24
                    Because he's a miserible POS (nm) - mizzoumurfkc KC - 5/6 10:40:46
     The leak is appalling, but less appalling than the content - SparkyStalcup MU - 5/6 10:08:04
          Great work justifying immoral behavior. - RHAYWORTH MU - 5/6 10:31:55
          yer a racist & u like black babies dead. we know killer(nm) - TigerFan92 STL - 5/6 10:14:18
          Any honest person should be able to admit - Sal CMSU - 5/6 10:12:14
               any honest person would acknowledge the 9th amendment(nm) - gmmm98 MU - 5/6 11:33:03
               False assertion nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 5/6 10:17:49
                    how?(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 5/6 10:23:02
          Please detail specifically what you find appalling - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 5/6 10:11:57
          What is appalling about sending state law back to the states - Spanky KU - 5/6 10:11:31
          What is appalling about the draft? - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 5/6 10:11:02
          Why. The radical SC made the law initially. NOW the radical - tman MU - 5/6 10:10:58
               You believe the current Supreme Court is radical? Nm - hokie VT - 5/6 10:18:02
                    Sarcasm (nm) - tman MU - 5/6 10:21:28
                         Missed it. Sorry. Nm - hokie VT - 5/6 10:26:23
          Is it appalling because it is bad law, because it is - hokie VT - 5/6 10:10:10
               It's bad law and also against the vast majority of people nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 5/6 10:12:12
                    Define vast. Abortion on demand isn't supported - RHAYWORTH MU - 5/6 10:34:07
                    In your feelings(nm) - Wildcat KSU - 5/6 10:19:52
                    Seriously, why is it bad law? And should the supreme court - hokie VT - 5/6 10:15:23
                         Gotta go back to work. But suffice it to say that it - SparkyStalcup MU - 5/6 10:19:26
                              Those fries won't cook themselves. - RHAYWORTH MU - 5/6 10:35:05
                              WADR, Do you have offered vague talking points with no - hokie VT - 5/6 10:24:22
                              You are running away. But get to work(nm) - tman MU - 5/6 10:22:14
                    So th SC should rule based on popular opinion - tman MU - 5/6 10:13:49
               He doesnt agree. I will answer for him - tman MU - 5/6 10:11:57




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard