Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

If this is your belief then why stop at birth? Why can't

Posted on: May 3, 2022 at 07:14:11 CT
DHighlander NWMSU
Posts:
51747
Member For:
17.05 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
welfare mothers simply decide to kill their post-birth children too? Wouldn't that also address all of the problems you outlined?

How about capital punishment for all crimes committed by minors. Let's stop all of those criminals before they actually become habitual criminals and also reduce the welfare rolls.

You are one to something here in your addled old mind but you are limiting yourself for some reason.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

I see its almost a guarantee that our welfare - GA Tiger MU - 5/3 06:12:10
     If you love playing Gof so much then start a cult and - tigertix MU - 5/3 07:29:24
     Many states will still allow baby killing, GAT. - ummmm MU - 5/3 07:22:36
     If this is your belief then why stop at birth? Why can't - DHighlander NWMSU - 5/3 07:14:11
          Because they don't want to go to jail for murder. Why - GA Tiger MU - 5/3 07:24:23
               Then they won't get abortions either if they become illegal, - DHighlander NWMSU - 5/3 07:42:53
          Wonderful logic - meatiger MU - 5/3 07:19:14
               Care to identify the fallacy? GaT said it was okay to kill - DHighlander NWMSU - 5/3 08:24:19
               If one can arbitrarily decide when life begins to ease - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 5/3 07:21:15
     There's absolutely NOTHING in the U.S. Constitution... - Deputy Dawg MU - 5/3 07:06:42
          Totally irrelevant as you must know. There is - GA Tiger MU - 5/3 07:22:40
               Do you think that birth control is not free and readily - DHighlander NWMSU - 5/3 08:27:21
               Freedom to assemble (nm) - ashtray UF - 5/3 08:03:41
          To answer your funding question of why those who oppose it - raskolnikov MU - 5/3 07:13:29
          Does the U.S. Constitution...say anything about automatic - Ace A - 5/3 07:09:32
               You may want to read the second ammendment, better yet - DHighlander NWMSU - 5/3 07:15:40
                    Then why are they illegal? (nm) - ashtray UF - 5/3 08:04:23
                         Good question.(nm) - DHighlander NWMSU - 5/3 08:27:48
               It does - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 5/3 07:10:51
     Drivel. Racist drivel. (nm) - hefeweizen MU - 5/3 07:03:36
     Racist ^^ likes brown babies being killed (nm) - TigerFan92 STL - 5/3 07:02:37
     but it's great for my unlicensed abortion business! - ashtray UF - 5/3 06:51:18
     And the “legal” slaughter of babies will decrease - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 5/3 06:43:35
          Herein lies the ignorance. A fetus is not a baby. A fetus - Ace A - 5/3 06:55:34
               A one month old cannot survive on its own either. By your - DHighlander NWMSU - 5/3 08:30:34
               Explain in detail the moment life begins and we - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 5/3 07:00:20
                    The duty is yours. Your basis of a fetus being a baby is - Ace A - 5/3 07:07:44
                         The duty is not mine - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 5/3 07:08:40
                              What a dodge. - Ace A - 5/3 07:10:34
                                   It is the only moral and legal rationale - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 5/3 07:11:43
                                        You’ve made no argument. Smugs are that way. - Ace A - 5/3 07:13:40
                              If he's arguing it, then it isn't inarguable - ashtray UF - 5/3 07:09:33
                    You can't have it both ways(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 5/3 07:01:42
                         There isn’t another way - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 5/3 07:09:40
                              ^^^ feels guilty about jerking off - ashtray UF - 5/3 08:10:33
                              That is your line so and it IS a matter of definitions - raskolnikov MU - 5/3 07:23:08
                                   If it is not human what exactly do you believe it to be?(nm) - DHighlander NWMSU - 5/3 08:31:54
                                        Unalienable - hokkkie (nm) - ashtray UF - 5/3 08:42:11
                                   So prove when it becomes life and set an - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 5/3 07:27:27
                                        Again you can't have it both ways(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 5/3 07:38:04
                                             I am not - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 5/3 07:44:59
                                                  So, not playing your game, BUT your stance is that women - raskolnikov MU - 5/3 07:53:47
                                                       No, my point is that it must be proven they are not killing - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 5/3 07:55:35
          It simply should not be up to the state friend(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 5/3 06:53:04
               Which is what the SCOTUS is about to say(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 5/3 07:04:44
               Show me constitutionally otherwise - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 5/3 07:00:59
                    RE: Show me constitutionally otherwise - Ace A - 5/3 07:14:20
                         You proved my point - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 5/3 07:16:44
                              You still haven’t shown why a fetus equals a baby - Ace A - 5/3 07:32:56
                                   And that’s the point - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 5/3 07:34:34
                                        So does sperm at some point - ashtray UF - 5/3 08:12:44
                    It should not be up to the state, sorry(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 5/3 07:04:00
                         So it’s your baseless opinion - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 5/3 07:10:13
     There are social costs, yes sir - raskolnikov MU - 5/3 06:37:45
     Astute - Ace A - 5/3 06:22:04




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard