 |
|
Notice that when america haters say
Posted on: February 25, 2022 at 11:35:55 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
68173
Member For:
9.66 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
"that's a lie" they generally do so without examples or explanation.
There have been cases where judges and justices have
"made stuff up", no doubt. Some of our judges are corrupt or totally political, and i expect to add another of those to the supreme court shortly.
She will likely not face the scrutiny from the america haters here, as her objective of harming and diminishing the united states coincides nicely with theirs.
It is never alleged or even contemplated that someone who disagrees with the haters' opinion on anything is just wrong or misunderstood or confused...
Nope, THEY LIED.
Or THEY MADE STUFF UP.
Nefarious motives must be assumed instead of ignorance or a difference of opinion.
We are all tired of JG calling everyone who disagrees with him a liar. I have been called as much by him on many occasions, which is why i rarely bother to read his drivel any more.
He must think me infallible as it cannot be assumed that i am wrong about anything. Any mistake or disagreement with JG is A LIE.
In fifth grade i took a 100 question T/F test. I missed three. By JG's definition, i lied three times.
And if there is an honest disagreement why not provide examples of how i am wrong and you are correct?
Below, village proclaimed that LITERALLY, every opinion by SCOTUS had made up stuff in it. To make such a statement and to be taken seriously, we must believe that pinkle has actually read literally every decision by the court since its founding.
Ya think...?
And since he offered as he typically does, only a proclamation with no explanation or evidence, we must believe that he is honest and trustworthy and has the moral fiber and ethical clarity of solomon.
Ya think...?
He is just too busy or too high and mighty do deign to provide mere peasants with evidence or explanation. The man who rails against government demands to be treated as if he is the government. And a government who is always right, and is never to be questioned.
Hence, no examples or evidence are needed. We must agree and obey.
Like the people who label everyone racists with whom they disagree, pinkle acts like the tyrannical government he claims to despise.
Below he appended the word, "fact" to his proclamation of,
EVERY. Single. Decision.
Thereby giving his personal imprimatur to his personal simplistic sophistry, assuming that his personal endorsement of his personal opinion carries weight with anyone but himself and his adolescent acolytes.
People with no valid point to make, or without the inability to make a point, eschew evidence in favor of invective.
Is it even conceivable that on occasions, justices on the supreme court had and will have a learned disagreement with the likes of pinkle and ummmm? Or must any disagreement with them be the product of deceit and just making stuff up?
Cannot two or more people on the supreme court have a different interpretation of the words of the constitution? Is that even possible, and if not should we just look to ummm and pinkle to provide the right answer and the proper interpretation?
People incapable of make a point instead make a proclamation.
People incapable of providing evidence or examples of their point, make a proclamation.
It is the racists who most frequently call others racists.
It is those who deny others the respect or the right to disagree, who decry the powers of a democratic government and label the government what they believe themselves to be, always right and unchallengeable.
Edited by hokie at 11:38:40 on 02/25/22
There have been cases where judges and justices have
"made stuff up", no doubt. Some of our judges are corrupt or totally political, and i expect to add another of those to the supreme court shortly.
She will likely not face the scrutiny from the america haters here, as her objective of harming and diminishing the united states coincides nicely with theirs.
It is never alleged or even contemplated that someone who disagrees with the haters' opinion on anything is just wrong or misunderstood or confused...
Nope, THEY LIED.
Or THEY MADE STUFF UP.
Nefarious motives must be assumed instead of ignorance or a difference of opinion.
We are all tired of JG calling everyone who disagrees with him a liar. I have been called as much by him on many occasions, which is why i rarely bother to read his drivel any more.
He must think me infallible as it cannot be assumed that i am wrong about anything. Any mistake or disagreement with JG is A LIE.
In fifth grade i took a 100 question T/F test. I missed three. By JG's definition, i lied three times.
And if there is an honest disagreement why not provide examples of how i am wrong and you are correct?
Below, village proclaimed that LITERALLY, every opinion by SCOTUS had made up stuff in it. To make such a statement and to be taken seriously, we must believe that pinkle has actually read literally every decision by the court since its founding.
Ya think...?
And since he offered as he typically does, only a proclamation with no explanation or evidence, we must believe that he is honest and trustworthy and has the moral fiber and ethical clarity of solomon.
Ya think...?
He is just too busy or too high and mighty do deign to provide mere peasants with evidence or explanation. The man who rails against government demands to be treated as if he is the government. And a government who is always right, and is never to be questioned.
Hence, no examples or evidence are needed. We must agree and obey.
Like the people who label everyone racists with whom they disagree, pinkle acts like the tyrannical government he claims to despise.
Below he appended the word, "fact" to his proclamation of,
EVERY. Single. Decision.
Thereby giving his personal imprimatur to his personal simplistic sophistry, assuming that his personal endorsement of his personal opinion carries weight with anyone but himself and his adolescent acolytes.
People with no valid point to make, or without the inability to make a point, eschew evidence in favor of invective.
Is it even conceivable that on occasions, justices on the supreme court had and will have a learned disagreement with the likes of pinkle and ummmm? Or must any disagreement with them be the product of deceit and just making stuff up?
Cannot two or more people on the supreme court have a different interpretation of the words of the constitution? Is that even possible, and if not should we just look to ummm and pinkle to provide the right answer and the proper interpretation?
People incapable of make a point instead make a proclamation.
People incapable of providing evidence or examples of their point, make a proclamation.
It is the racists who most frequently call others racists.
It is those who deny others the respect or the right to disagree, who decry the powers of a democratic government and label the government what they believe themselves to be, always right and unchallengeable.
Edited by hokie at 11:38:40 on 02/25/22
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
Notice that when america haters say - hokie VT - 2/25 11:35:55
-