 |
|
it's a weird case. the prosecution basically said had she
Posted on: February 18, 2022 at 11:51:05 CT
blake1771 MU
Posts:
14451
Member For:
20.02 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
intended to draw her firearm and shoot she would have been justified but since she meant to tase him and accidentally shot him then it was reckless.
should she have known the difference? yeah.
was there intent to kill him? no.
was it negligent? yes.
was it reckless with depraved indifference? i don't think so.
should she have known the difference? yeah.
was there intent to kill him? no.
was it negligent? yes.
was it reckless with depraved indifference? i don't think so.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
it's a weird case. the prosecution basically said had she - blake1771 MU - 2/18 11:51:05