Welcome Guest

Durham's filing states that Sussman acknowledged

Posted on: February 15, 2022 at 17:18:12 CT
Sal CMSU
Posts:
229171
Member For:
21.99 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
he was working for an unnamed client in a Dec 2017 testimony to the House, but in 2016 he told The FBI General Counsel that he was not working on behalf of any client.

"In his testimony, the defendant acknowledged bringing the Russian Bank-1 allegations to the FBI General Counsel and to Agency-2 on behalf of a specific client, namely, Tech Executive-1 (whom the defendant did not identify by name). The Government expects to offer this testimony at trial to prove that the defendant knowingly and intentionally lied when he stated to the FBI General Counsel in September 2016 that he was
not
acting on behalf of “any client.”"

https://www.scribd.com/document/558481943/USA-v-Sussmann-Durham-Filing-Motion-on-Potential-Conflicts-of-Interest#download&from_embed

Sussman couldn't have been telling the truth both times if that information is accurate

Edited by Sal at 17:20:01 on 02/15/22
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     old news, Einsal. - tigerdb MU - 2/15 15:36:00
          "nothing to see here" - Sal CMSU - 2/15 15:42:41
               As noted earlier, dunham's inclusion of the cia contact - tigerdb MU - 2/15 15:48:12
                    Durham's filing states that Sussman acknowledged - Sal CMSU - 2/15 17:18:12
     I'd love to see brennan hang. - RHAYWORTH MU - 2/15 14:42:33
          Along with clapper. But first should be strozyk. - GA Tiger MU - 2/15 15:20:08




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard