he was working for an unnamed client in a Dec 2017 testimony to the House, but in 2016 he told The FBI General Counsel that he was not working on behalf of any client.
"In his testimony, the defendant acknowledged bringing the Russian Bank-1 allegations to the FBI General Counsel and to Agency-2 on behalf of a specific client, namely, Tech Executive-1 (whom the defendant did not identify by name). The Government expects to offer this testimony at trial to prove that the defendant knowingly and intentionally lied when he stated to the FBI General Counsel in September 2016 that he was
not
acting on behalf of “any client.”"
https://www.scribd.com/document/558481943/USA-v-Sussmann-Durham-Filing-Motion-on-Potential-Conflicts-of-Interest#download&from_embed
Sussman couldn't have been telling the truth both times if that information is accurate
Edited by Sal at 17:20:01 on 02/15/22