Welcome Guest

Has Assange's implication been proven wrong?...

Posted on: February 15, 2022 at 13:17:18 CT
JeffB MU
Posts:
72861
Member For:
21.61 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     Crickets over at the NYT. nm. - MUTGR MU - 2/15 13:05:20
     So is the White House IT security - meatiger MU - 2/15 13:01:49
          There's no evidence the DNC was spied on. Is this another - BH O'bonga MU - 2/15 13:05:41
               So all the emails released were fake?(nm) - meatiger MU - 2/15 13:07:14
                    Are you incapable of considering alternative scenarios? Are - BH O'bonga MU - 2/15 13:12:00
                    If an insider had pangs of conscience & became a whistleblow - JeffB MU - 2/15 13:08:47
                         so now you are suggesting that an insider - meatiger MU - 2/15 13:15:39
                              No, but Assange implied that. Do you have evidence to refute - JeffB MU - 2/15 13:18:30
                                   I have no idea - meatiger MU - 2/15 13:23:50
                                        White House IT security was provided by Obama holdovers - BH O'bonga MU - 2/15 14:49:50
                         Is that what you call "tech executive 1" - an insider with - tigerdb MU - 2/15 13:13:16
                              you're on the list, commie (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU - 2/15 13:25:38
                              Has Assange's implication been proven wrong?... - JeffB MU - 2/15 13:17:18
                              Durham has GJ testimony and documentary evidence. He didn't - BH O'bonga MU - 2/15 13:15:15
                                   again - if "Tech Executive 1" did something wrong, charge - tigerdb MU - 2/15 13:23:02




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard