 |
|
In other words it's the legislature's intent
Posted on: January 29, 2022 at 15:41:08 CT
ScottsdaleTiger MU
Posts:
12760
Member For:
26.33 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
I.e. a provision requiring voters id themselves could be intended to suppress minority voters or
it could be intended to prevent voters voting multiple times if no id is required or if their id is not checked against a master list.
It just depends on the legislature's intent at the time the requirement was inacted.
Put it another way, requirements intended to insure only eligible voters vote can be voter suppression or not, depending solely on the legislature's intent at the time the statute was enacted.
The cited definition sounds nice, but practically it's meaningless.
it could be intended to prevent voters voting multiple times if no id is required or if their id is not checked against a master list.
It just depends on the legislature's intent at the time the requirement was inacted.
Put it another way, requirements intended to insure only eligible voters vote can be voter suppression or not, depending solely on the legislature's intent at the time the statute was enacted.
The cited definition sounds nice, but practically it's meaningless.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
- 
In other words it's the legislature's intent - ScottsdaleTiger MU - 1/29 15:41:08