Welcome Guest

Sign In | Register

Hypotheticals test principles. You don't like hypotheticals

Posted on: December 1, 2021 at 13:10:25 CT

hokie VT

Posts:

65046

Member For:

9.07 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

1

because your principles are "flexible".

I'll help you out, it is ok to have exceptions say...in case you could save hundreds of innocent lives.

But you're too stupid to see that so you hold to your moronic "I'll never turn my brother into the state" lunacy.

What if you knew your brother was going to kill your wife and family. THE ONLY way to stop him is to call THE STATE.

Exception?

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

I don't often disagree with TCarlson, but last night in his - hokie VT - 12/1 12:00:28

Maybe you should learn sarcasm(nm) - dangertim MU

- 12/1 12:52:46

Thanx timmy. Stay vague. nm - hokie VT - 12/1 13:05:48

Helping his brother wasn't what got him under fire (nm) - Sal CMSU - 12/1 12:38:54

As a patriotic conservative nonracist American - JG MU

- 12/1 12:04:39

As often as you lie, I think that you'd get better at it. - Reagan STL - 12/1 12:16:48

I would definitely help my brother out with regards to - ummmm MU - 12/1 12:04:12

The problem with your response is that same as with TC's - hokie VT - 12/1 12:10:54

RE: The problem with your response is that same as with TC's - ummmm MU - 12/1 12:14:43

So if you're CERTAIN he committed a serious crime, you would - hokie VT - 12/1 12:18:10

Yes, but you're also adding facts to the Cuomo situation. - ummmm MU - 12/1 12:19:34

My comments were not restricted to the Cuomos. PERIOD. TC - hokie VT - 12/1 12:21:55

He's right. - ummmm MU - 12/1 12:24:16

If your brother were planning to bomb an occupied office - hokie VT - 12/1 12:26:10

I wouldn't turn him in to the State. (nm) - ummmm MU - 12/1 12:30:37

So hundreds die because you wouldn't turn him - hokie VT - 12/1 12:31:49

No, I would try to stop him. - ummmm MU - 12/1 12:37:19

I said "those are your only options". You chose - hokie VT - 12/1 12:51:47

I wasn't going to play by your unreal state obsessed - ummmm MU - 12/1 12:56:15

So in this uncomfortable hypothetical, YOU KNOW that your - hokie VT - 12/1 12:59:02

this is the false dichotomy he just mentioned - pickle MU

- 12/1 13:09:12

For the 5th time in this thread, I am not turning my brother - ummmm MU - 12/1 12:59:52

even Ted Kaczynski‘s brother - pickle MU

- 12/1 13:10:24

poor hokie - pickle MU

- 12/1 12:53:02

How can you have so much faith in govt prosecutors? - ummmm MU - 12/1 12:37:57

What DOES THAT have to do with anything? You can turn him - hokie VT - 12/1 12:55:52

false choice (nm) - pickle MU

- 12/1 12:59:34

Because there are other non-state solutions to address your - ummmm MU - 12/1 12:58:27

What if a muzz defines his "brothers" as any radical muzz - hokie VT - 12/1 13:03:59

what if a Jew did that? - ashtray UF - 12/1 13:08:44

These are the worst hypotheticals ever. (nm) - ummmm MU - 12/1 13:06:36

Hypotheticals test principles. You don't like hypotheticals - hokie VT - 12/1 13:10:25

These are bizarre hypotheticals that completely depart from - ummmm MU - 12/1 13:12:34

Hypotheticals frighten libs. When you speak in absolutes, - hokie VT - 12/1 13:14:56

I though I was flexible in my principles? Now I'm accused - ummmm MU - 12/1 13:17:42

so which is it, Mr Hypothetical? - ashtray UF - 12/1 13:15:58

wrong board (nm) - pickle MU

- 12/1 12:02:51

©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy About Tigerboard