that makes no sense, b/c the one example you keep using of Manafort and Kilimnik happened AFTER the initial investigation was launched. Therefore, something can't be known that hasn't happened yet. Also, that article you posted a few threads down didn't prove anything:
http://www.tigerboard.com/boards/view.php?message=17851593
There is a reason Mueller and his team didn't even bother with it b/c they couldn't prove anything other than Manafort lied about his interaction with Kilimnik. Your logic literally makes no sense here.