Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Sadly, I think you are correct. There seems to be a de facto

Posted on: September 27, 2021 at 13:19:10 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
64005
Member For:
8.88 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Sadly, I think you are correct. There seems to be a de facto, statute of limitations in elections.

And presidents can be impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors committed while in office, but that would only apply to presidents seeking reelection. Whispering Joe would be unimpeachable, in my opinion. And I suppose little people could go to jail, or in the case of Marxists, get their wrists slapped.

But whatever damage has been done will likely remain intact.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Hypothetically, if a candidate cheated and won but it wasn’t - hokie VT - 9/27 13:04:58
     Why do you persist self-reflective bull****?(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 9/27 18:33:04
     Heroes like mu4ever point this out - El-ahrairah BAMA - 9/27 14:17:43
     Well, we know the remedy the Dems used… - Outsider MU - 9/27 14:12:43
     Seriously? There is no remedy unless it can be proven that - DHighlander NWMSU - 9/27 13:33:40
          Not sure if you can impeach someone for actions BEFORE - hokie VT - 9/27 13:35:27
               Dems impeached Trump twice for no “impeachable” crimes - Outsider MU - 9/27 14:15:19
               I dont think it actually specifies. They cannot be charged - DHighlander NWMSU - 9/27 14:09:08
     Once an election is certified - meatiger MU - 9/27 13:30:19
          I think you are correct. Although criminal activity by other - hokie VT - 9/27 13:34:23
               not correct. States can absolutely call their electors - 5_Star_True_Son MU - 9/27 13:40:50
                    They can do that a year later? Two years later…? Nm - hokie VT - 9/27 14:06:47
                         I guess the time limit would be 4 years (before 2024) - 5_Star_True_Son MU - 9/27 14:26:35
               State legislators can also decertify, proven fraud vitiates - Razor MU - 9/27 13:40:26
                    Did you intend to say trump instead of biden? Nm - hokie VT - 9/27 13:43:16
                         RE: Did you intend to say trump instead of biden? Nm - Razor MU - 9/27 13:44:58
                              Got it, thanx. Nm - hokie VT - 9/27 14:10:12
     lol (nm) - pickle MU - 9/27 13:27:12
     No remedy(nm) - Spanky KU - 9/27 13:15:00
          Other than eliminating the cheating, rules allowing it. - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/27 13:21:52
               lol (nm) - pickle MU - 9/27 13:59:40
          Sadly, I think you are correct. There seems to be a de facto - hokie VT - 9/27 13:19:10
          Outside of the next election - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 9/27 13:19:01
               Yep... Which is why Justice Thomas' dissent is spot on: - Spanky KU - 9/27 14:40:51
               It is not really a worthy exercise - meatiger MU - 9/27 13:31:11
                    Yes, the only profitable action - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 9/27 14:02:30
                         never said that.... - meatiger MU - 9/27 14:07:09
                    Like with the China virus, bank robbery, murder and - hokie VT - 9/27 13:37:56
                         It is the basis of government power - meatiger MU - 9/27 13:46:30




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard