Welcome Guest

are you sure?

Posted on: September 15, 2021 at 15:30:12 CT
Ace UNC
Posts:
28903
Member For:
6.01 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
A defense official familiar with the calls said that description is “grossly mischaracterized.”

The official said the calls were not out of the ordinary, and the chairman was not frantically trying to reassure his counterpart.

The people also said that Milley did not go rogue in placing the call, as the book suggests. In fact, Milley asked permission from acting Defense Secretary Chris Miller before making the call, said one former senior defense official, who was in the room for the meeting. Milley also briefed the secretary’s office after the call, the former official said.

“We discussed beforehand and after his call with his Chinese counterpart,” the person said, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive topic.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     not treason - Spanky KU - 9/15 14:57:29
          are you sure? - Ace AU - 9/15 15:30:12
               Thank god we have you as an expert on these issues… - Outsider MU - 9/15 16:36:58
               Are you saying Woodward lied? - Spanky KU - 9/15 15:37:24
                    have you read the book? - Ace AU - 9/15 15:54:32
                         Excerpts have been released - Spanky KU - 9/15 16:05:32
                              So, you haven't read the book - Ace AU - 9/15 16:22:38
                                   When has Esper said he approved Milley's insubordination? - Spanky KU - 9/15 16:41:46
     Why would he be? - Say_What MU - 9/15 14:22:28
          Why would he be? - Sal CMSU - 9/15 14:28:32
     The report is most likely bullsh*t anyways (nm) - Sal CMSU - 9/15 14:21:08
     No, he's trying to figure out how to get more weapons - Reagan STL - 9/15 14:19:02
     🖕 you kooks and - mizzoumurfkc KC - 9/15 14:11:11
          was that your take on Trump and Flynn? - blake1771 MU - 9/15 14:26:35
               No! And why would it have been? Flynny did two very - mizzoumurfkc KC - 9/15 14:45:10
                    Flynn should have never been investigated to begin with (nm) - Sal CMSU - 9/15 14:46:59
                         Of course he should have, einsal - mizzoumurfkc KC - 9/15 14:51:56
                              Please enlighten us again - Sal CMSU - 9/15 17:22:54
                              What are those two things? - tman MU - 9/15 14:54:50
          lol. he'd have to read it first (nm) - ashtray UF - 9/15 14:25:13
     of course not - JG A - 9/15 13:47:03




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard