Welcome Guest

Actually, it's precedent being set. Again, the situations

Posted on: July 20, 2021 at 16:32:36 CT

SparkyStalcup MU

Posts:

25023

Member For:

13.47 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

aren't completely analogous since Swalwell isn't spending tax $$$, but I imagine if Trump's expenditures were deemed to be ok, Swalwell's will also. Swalwell's expenditures look to be pretty small.potatoes.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Swalwell in trouble? - Spanky KU - 7/20 15:37:44

No republican is above the law. So, no problem here. Nm - hokie VT - 7/20 16:39:49

Probably not. While the optics aren't good on this one, it - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/20 15:56:34

Wait, your defense is what about Trump? Lol JFC(nm) - hefeweizen MU

- 7/20 16:10:00

It is funny the poster that brings this foxnews urgent story - JayHoaxH8r MU

- 7/20 17:26:49

Actually, it's precedent being set. Again, the situations - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/20 16:32:36

Nope. What Trump did was 100% legal. What Swalwell did - Spanky KU - 7/20 17:56:01

Name the law that says specifically what Swalwell did is - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/20 20:14:39

2 U.S.C. § 439a(b)(1)(nm) - Spanky KU - 7/21 00:46:42

I would agree with this (nm) - mizzouSECedes STL - 7/20 16:42:24

Not possible - scan MU - 7/20 15:43:01

When is the last time a Dem was actually sanctioned for - DHighlander NWMSU - 7/20 15:39:24