Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

sure it would be and I don't know

Posted on: July 14, 2021 at 12:56:09 CT
Ragnar Danneskjold MU
Posts:
81634
Member For:
20.20 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
but again that isn't the issue.

your hypothetical assumes both sides have solved that issue or they wouldn't "have" their forces.

thus the only way the decision to go to war would be "expensive" is if the other side's forces are equal or approaching equal.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

how would anarcho-capitalism work? - pickle MU - 7/14 12:11:32
     I hope police and law enforcement isn't your best example, - MUTGR MU - 7/14 13:36:20
          Why do you require absolutes? - meatiger MU - 7/14 15:42:51
               I don't, that's your guys schtick. nm. - MUTGR MU - 7/14 15:51:12
          ever heard of a toll road? - ashtray UF - 7/14 13:55:16
               I would have encountered dozens already today. nm. - MUTGR MU - 7/14 15:56:49
                    how do you know? (nm) - pickle MU - 7/14 17:08:19
                    ok? (nm) - ashtray UF - 7/14 16:06:01
                         What about that thought is suppossed to make me think, ah, - MUTGR MU - 7/14 16:24:25
                              you prefer socialized services? - ashtray UF - 7/14 16:29:01
     Wrong board. - RHAYWORTH MU - 7/14 12:19:07
     warfare is only expensive if the warring parties are equally - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 7/14 12:13:51
          How much has warring in mideast cost us?(nm) - meatiger MU - 7/14 12:19:39
               Wholly irrelevant to pickle's hypothetical - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 7/14 12:22:55
                    Not at all - meatiger MU - 7/14 12:27:01
                         lol no one is talking about conquering anything goddam - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 7/14 12:29:13
                              you aren’t making any sense - pickle MU - 7/14 12:41:01
                                   lol where in the post's hypothetical did it talk about - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 7/14 12:57:07
          No.. cause I'd put this guy on my team. - TigerMatt - 7/14 12:16:58
          false - ashtray UF - 7/14 12:14:29
               lol wut, that wouldn't play into any decision-making - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 7/14 12:18:31
                    paid by whom? (nm) - pickle MU - 7/14 12:29:45
                         whoever owns them in your scenario - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 7/14 12:33:48
                              that would be very expensive - pickle MU - 7/14 12:38:48
                                   sure it would be and I don't know - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 7/14 12:56:09
                                        It is the issue - pickle MU - 7/14 12:58:33
                                             no it's not but go ahead and tap out b*tch - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 7/14 13:01:55
                                                  there is no change of assumption - pickle MU - 7/14 13:09:27
                    do you normally hire 100k soldiers to sit around - ashtray UF - 7/14 12:19:09
                         No but that actually strengthens my point - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 7/14 12:22:20
                              you're contradicting yourself (nm) - ashtray UF - 7/14 12:25:51
                                   how?(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 7/14 12:28:47
                                        I asked if you normally hire 100k soldiers to sit around - ashtray UF - 7/14 12:30:13
                                             You're talking about a "maintenance" cost that would have - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 7/14 12:33:02
                                                  the point is you wouldn't have all those soldiers - ashtray UF - 7/14 12:35:43
                                                       that is bringing in a new assumption that isn't present - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 7/14 12:38:43
                                                            no it isn't.. it's basic logic, trannyboy (nm) - ashtray UF - 7/14 12:39:08
                                                                 lol yes it is. go braid dunhill's pontail jamal(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 7/14 12:57:41
                                                                      you’re losing here (nm) - pickle MU - 7/14 13:09:48
                                   He's repeatedly inserting his strong point.(nm) - Toger STL - 7/14 12:28:24
     I like kids! - PEDOWORTH (nm) - ashtray UF - 7/14 12:12:31
          I do like kids. Unlike you, pickle, I don't sex them. - RHAYWORTH MU - 7/14 12:25:08
               like Clinton didn't have sex with that girl, right? - ashtray UF - 7/14 12:26:32
          I like 15 year old hotties, not their saggy moms - Tigrrrr!(nm) - TigerMatt - 7/14 12:17:52




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard