Little's logic for reversing McGeachin's order doesn't really make sense though:
"The governor said the reversal was meant to "restore local control" after an instance of state government overreach. He warned that McGeachin’s order would have had "alarming consequences" if it had remained in place, preventing state authorities from implementing safety requirements for social workers visiting at-risk individuals or at "facilities that are particularly vulnerable to outbreaks."
So those individuals interacting with each other couldn't protect themselves as they best see fit?
It's also hard to argue the abuse of power angle when Little implemented lockdown orders.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/idaho-mask-mandates-lieutenant-governor-janice-mcgeachin-brad-little