Welcome Guest

I assume he meant property ownership by individuals

Posted on: May 31, 2021 at 19:32:35 CT
Newcatbirdseat MU
Posts:
14990
Member For:
8.80 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
would be a thing of the past i.e. it would instead be owned by the public (the state) for the Greater Good.

Then we'd all be happy owning nothing.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     How do you have checks and balances without owning - TigerMatt STL - 5/31 22:45:28
     Not what dude meant, but I could probably get used to - Newcatbirdseat MU - 5/31 19:00:22
          What did he mean then? (nm) - tcat KC - 5/31 19:26:14
               I assume he meant property ownership by individuals - Newcatbirdseat MU - 5/31 19:32:35
                    RE: I assume he meant property ownership by individuals - pinkman MU - 5/31 20:09:13
          Maybe, but it's for the Greater Good. - ummmm MU - 5/31 18:49:26
               RE: Maybe, but it's for the Greater Good. - THEGROVE68 MU - 6/1 06:36:31
               RE: Maybe, but it's for the Greater Good. - scan MU - 5/31 18:50:23
                    Then good on him. - ummmm MU - 5/31 18:52:16
                         RE: Then good on him. - scan MU - 5/31 18:52:41
                              That would mean less energy consumption. - ummmm MU - 5/31 18:55:03
                                   RE: That would mean less energy consumption. - scan MU - 5/31 18:56:37
                                        I'll host a barbecue in your honor someday. - ummmm MU - 5/31 18:57:36




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard