Welcome Guest

Actually, no

Posted on: April 22, 2021 at 15:28:11 CT
*M* KC
Posts:
31707
Member For:
24.14 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
He doesn't "advocate for life w/o parole for juveniles"

He says it is not unconstitutional to allow LWOP without a finding that the child is incorrigible. He doesn't express an opinion as to whether or not it is wise to impose such a sentence, or good public policy for a state to allow such a sentence. He simply says it's not prohibited by the 8th Amendment.

I think it is horrible public policy, and I'd support any state changing its laws if they allow that. But it's probably not in violation of the 8th Amendment.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Kavanaugh write majority opinion - Ace AU - 4/22 14:57:40
     I think bug zappers are a good idea. - Coors4bob MU - 4/22 16:12:03
     Must’ve been drunk again(nm) - El-ahrairah BAMA - 4/22 15:50:22
     Actually, no - *M* KC - 4/22 15:28:11
     They got it right - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/22 15:12:58
          no (nm) - pickle MU - 4/22 15:25:17
          A lad who is 17 1/2, has three kids by three different women - hokie VT - 4/22 15:20:12
               There is nothing magic about something a 17 year old - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/22 16:35:32
               be consistent (nm) - pickle MU - 4/22 15:25:51
     But when it comes to consenting to sex - meatiger MU - 4/22 15:05:58
     good. (nm) - ZouMiz STL - 4/22 15:01:47
     Looks like the proper decision(nm) - Spanky KU - 4/22 15:01:33




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard