Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

It was not intended to mean a singular person

Posted on: April 20, 2021 at 15:36:06 CT
Sal CMSU
Posts:
229171
Member For:
21.98 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
in which an act was directly being aimed towards. The appeals court in MN is recently trying to redefine what it means, but to my knowledge the MN Supreme Court has not ruled on it yet. There is a reason Cahill initially dismissed it.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Will a manslaughter conviction be enough to calm the - hefeweizen MU - 4/20 15:10:00
     Not according to Maxine Waters. nm. - MUTGR MU - 4/20 15:17:38
     I don't think so (nm) - Sal CMSU - 4/20 15:16:01
     No. Neither would first-degree murder and a quick hanging. - hokie VT - 4/20 15:13:16
          First degree murder wasn't charged, cookie(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 4/20 15:14:30
          there was no first degree murder charge..derp(nm) - meatiger MU - 4/20 15:13:54
               RE: there was no first degree murder charge..derp(nm) - MOCO SON MU - 4/20 15:33:22
               Did i say there was? Psssst, there’ll be no quick - hokie VT - 4/20 15:15:55
     Nope..(nm) - Spanky KU - 4/20 15:13:08
     3rd degree Murder is coming - mizzoumurfkc KC - 4/20 15:12:23
          That one didn't even make sense (nm) - Sal CMSU - 4/20 15:16:15
               Why do you think that?(nm) - Mo Texan MU - 4/20 15:20:40
                    The act wasn't imminently dangerous to others - Sal CMSU - 4/20 15:27:21
                         “others” includes Floyd(nm) - Mo Texan MU - 4/20 15:31:50
                              It was not intended to mean a singular person - Sal CMSU - 4/20 15:36:06
                                   You’re speaking to section B not A - Mo Texan MU - 4/20 15:37:36
                                        How does that apply? (nm) - Sal CMSU - 4/20 15:42:43
                                             Just my opinion that it is the proper charge-we will see(nm) - Mo Texan MU - 4/20 15:53:45
                                                  He very well could get charged with it, but Cahill was - Sal CMSU - 4/20 15:57:32
                                        Is this the charge you think he will be found guilty.(nm) - miz_zou MU - 4/20 15:40:44
                                             Nothing is for sure, but that and possibly manslaughter. I - Mo Texan MU - 4/20 15:43:58
                                             lol (nm) - mizzouSECedes STL - 4/20 15:41:07
                                                  ?(nm) - miz_zou MU - 4/20 15:55:01
                    Salthink - mizzoumurfkc KC - 4/20 15:24:27
                         can't help it - dangertim MU - 4/20 15:25:26
                              lol I haven't seen that (nm) - Sal CMSU - 4/20 15:30:08
          Anything more than manslaughter is ripe for successful - hefeweizen MU - 4/20 15:13:54
               I don't think so (nm) - mizzoumurfkc KC - 4/20 15:17:06
                    Murder means intent to kill. Do you think he intended to - hefeweizen MU - 4/20 15:18:20
                         The jury doesn't - mizzoumurfkc KC - 4/20 15:23:27
                              No. Murder is death(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 4/20 15:31:46
                         I would hope he doesn't believe that since he believes that - dangertim MU - 4/20 15:19:58
          probably as likely as Mueller(nm) - dangertim MU - 4/20 15:13:06
     THIS IS NO TIME FOR RHETORICAL QUESTIONS!(nm) - Fred G. Sanford USA - 4/20 15:12:06
     No (nm) - mizzouSECedes STL - 4/20 15:11:45
     Hard to say - meatiger MU - 4/20 15:11:15
     No, the air jordans must flow(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 4/20 15:10:45




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard